linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] rcu/kvfree: Add kvfree_rcu_barrier() API
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 18:26:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrZDPLN9CRvRrbMy@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2-5-ea79102f428c@suse.cz>

Hello, Vlastimil!

> From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
> 
> Add a kvfree_rcu_barrier() function. It waits until all
> in-flight pointers are freed over RCU machinery. It does
> not wait any GP completion and it is within its right to
> return immediately if there are no outstanding pointers.
> 
> This function is useful when there is a need to guarantee
> that a memory is fully freed before destroying memory caches.
> For example, during unloading a kernel module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
>  include/linux/rcutiny.h |   5 +++
>  include/linux/rcutree.h |   1 +
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c       | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
> index d9ac7b136aea..522123050ff8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ static inline void __kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
>  	kvfree(ptr);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void)
> +{
> +	rcu_barrier();
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
>  void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr);
>  #else
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
> index 254244202ea9..58e7db80f3a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(void)
>  
>  void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
>  void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr);
> +void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void);
>  
>  void rcu_barrier(void);
>  void rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(void);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index e641cc681901..ebcfed9b570e 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3584,18 +3584,15 @@ kvfree_rcu_drain_ready(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * This function is invoked after the KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES timeout.
> + * Return: %true if a work is queued, %false otherwise.
>   */
> -static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
> +static bool
> +kvfree_rcu_queue_batch(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
>  {
> -	struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = container_of(work,
> -		struct kfree_rcu_cpu, monitor_work.work);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool queued = false;
>  	int i, j;
>  
> -	// Drain ready for reclaim.
> -	kvfree_rcu_drain_ready(krcp);
> -
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&krcp->lock, flags);
>  
>  	// Attempt to start a new batch.
> @@ -3634,11 +3631,27 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>  			// be that the work is in the pending state when
>  			// channels have been detached following by each
>  			// other.
> -			queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work);
> +			queued = queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
> +	return queued;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function is invoked after the KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES timeout.
> + */
> +static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp = container_of(work,
> +		struct kfree_rcu_cpu, monitor_work.work);
> +
> +	// Drain ready for reclaim.
> +	kvfree_rcu_drain_ready(krcp);
> +
> +	// Queue a batch for a rest.
> +	kvfree_rcu_queue_batch(krcp);
>  
>  	// If there is nothing to detach, it means that our job is
>  	// successfully done here. In case of having at least one
> @@ -3859,6 +3872,80 @@ void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_call_rcu);
>  
> +/**
> + * kvfree_rcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight kvfree_rcu() complete.
> + *
> + * Note that a single argument of kvfree_rcu() call has a slow path that
> + * triggers synchronize_rcu() following by freeing a pointer. It is done
> + * before the return from the function. Therefore for any single-argument
> + * call that will result in a kfree() to a cache that is to be destroyed
> + * during module exit, it is developer's responsibility to ensure that all
> + * such calls have returned before the call to kmem_cache_destroy().
> + */
> +void kvfree_rcu_barrier(void)
> +{
> +	struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work *krwp;
> +	struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp;
> +	bool queued;
> +	int i, cpu;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Firstly we detach objects and queue them over an RCU-batch
> +	 * for all CPUs. Finally queued works are flushed for each CPU.
> +	 *
> +	 * Please note. If there are outstanding batches for a particular
> +	 * CPU, those have to be finished first following by queuing a new.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Check if this CPU has any objects which have been queued for a
> +		 * new GP completion. If not(means nothing to detach), we are done
> +		 * with it. If any batch is pending/running for this "krcp", below
> +		 * per-cpu flush_rcu_work() waits its completion(see last step).
> +		 */
> +		if (!need_offload_krc(krcp))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		while (1) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If we are not able to queue a new RCU work it means:
> +			 * - batches for this CPU are still in flight which should
> +			 *   be flushed first and then repeat;
> +			 * - no objects to detach, because of concurrency.
> +			 */
> +			queued = kvfree_rcu_queue_batch(krcp);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Bail out, if there is no need to offload this "krcp"
> +			 * anymore. As noted earlier it can run concurrently.
> +			 */
> +			if (queued || !need_offload_krc(krcp))
> +				break;
> +
> +			/* There are ongoing batches. */
> +			for (i = 0; i < KFREE_N_BATCHES; i++) {
> +				krwp = &(krcp->krw_arr[i]);
> +				flush_rcu_work(&krwp->rcu_work);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Now we guarantee that all objects are flushed.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		krcp = per_cpu_ptr(&krc, cpu);
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < KFREE_N_BATCHES; i++) {
> +			krwp = &(krcp->krw_arr[i]);
> +			flush_rcu_work(&krwp->rcu_work);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier);
> +
>  static unsigned long
>  kfree_rcu_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>  {
> 
> -- 
> 2.46.0
> 
I need to send out a v2. What is a best way? Please let me know. I have not
checked where this series already landed.

Thank you!

--
Uladzislau Rezki


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-09 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20240807-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2-0-ea79102f428c@suse.cz>
2024-08-09 15:02 ` [-next conflict imminent] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] mm, slub: handle pending kfree_rcu() in kmem_cache_destroy() Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-09 15:12   ` Jann Horn
2024-08-09 15:14     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-10  0:11       ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-10 20:25         ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-10 20:30           ` Andrew Morton
     [not found] ` <20240807-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2-5-ea79102f428c@suse.cz>
2024-08-09 16:26   ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2024-08-09 17:00     ` [PATCH v2 5/7] rcu/kvfree: Add kvfree_rcu_barrier() API Vlastimil Babka
2024-08-20 16:02       ` Uladzislau Rezki
     [not found] ` <20240807-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2-7-ea79102f428c@suse.cz>
2024-08-09 16:23   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() and test_leak_destroy() Uladzislau Rezki
2024-09-14 13:22   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2024-09-14 18:39     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-20 13:35   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-21 20:40     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-21 21:08       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-21 21:25         ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-22  6:16           ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2024-09-22 14:13             ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-25 12:56               ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2024-09-26 12:54                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-30  8:47                   ` Vlastimil Babka
     [not found] ` <20240807-b4-slab-kfree_rcu-destroy-v2-6-ea79102f428c@suse.cz>
2025-02-21 16:30   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm, slab: call kvfree_rcu_barrier() from kmem_cache_destroy() Keith Busch
2025-02-21 16:51     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-21 16:52       ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-21 17:28     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-24 11:44       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-24 15:37         ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:57         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-25 13:39           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-25 14:12             ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-25 16:03           ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 17:05             ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 17:41               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-25 18:11                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-25 18:21                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-25 18:21                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 10:59                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-26 14:31                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 14:36                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-26 15:42                         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 15:46                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-26 15:57                             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-02-26 15:51                   ` Keith Busch
2025-02-26 15:58                     ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZrZDPLN9CRvRrbMy@pc636 \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox