linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] memcontrol: define root_mem_cgroup for CONFIG_MEMCG=n cases
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:13:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZppKZJKMcPF4OGVc@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2050f8a1bc181a9aaf01e0866e230e23216000f4.1721384771.git.wqu@suse.com>

On Fri 19-07-24 19:58:39, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> There is an incoming btrfs patchset, which will use @root_mem_cgroup as
> the active cgroup to attach metadata folios to its internal btree
> inode, so that btrfs can skip the possibly costly charge for the
> internal inode which is only accessible by btrfs itself.
> 
> However @root_mem_cgroup is not always defined (not defined for
> CONFIG_MEMCG=n case), thus all such callers need to do the extra
> handling for different CONFIG_MEMCG settings.
> 
> So here we add a special macro definition of root_mem_cgroup, making it
> to always be NULL.

Isn't just a declaration sufficient? Nothing should really dereference
the pointer anyway.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-19 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-19 10:28 [PATCH v7 0/3] btrfs: try to allocate larger folios for metadata Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] memcontrol: define root_mem_cgroup for CONFIG_MEMCG=n cases Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 11:13   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-07-19 21:58     ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-22  7:32       ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] btrfs: always uses root memcgroup for filemap_add_folio() Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 17:02   ` Johannes Weiner
2024-07-19 17:25     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-07-19 18:13     ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-19 22:11       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-22  7:34         ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-22  8:08           ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-24  3:46       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 10:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] btrfs: prefer to allocate larger folio for metadata Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZppKZJKMcPF4OGVc@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox