From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] mm: memcg: rename soft limit reclaim-related functions
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:06:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Znpsk9yyXmMyA7Vf@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625005906.106920-4-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
On Mon 24-06-24 17:58:55, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Rename exported function related to the softlimit reclaim
> to have memcg1_ prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 12 ++++++------
> mm/memcontrol-v1.c | 6 +++---
> mm/memcontrol-v1.h | 4 ++--
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
> mm/vmscan.c | 10 +++++-----
> 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 7403dd5926eb..83c8327455d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -1121,9 +1121,9 @@ static inline void memcg_memory_event_mm(struct mm_struct *mm,
>
> void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_order);
>
> -unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - unsigned long *total_scanned);
> +unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + unsigned long *total_scanned);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
>
> @@ -1572,9 +1572,9 @@ static inline void split_page_memcg(struct page *head, int old_order, int new_or
> }
>
> static inline
> -unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - unsigned long *total_scanned)
> +unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + unsigned long *total_scanned)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> index 2ccb8406fa84..68e2f1a718d3 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static unsigned long soft_limit_excess(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> return excess;
> }
>
> -void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
> +void memcg1_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
> {
> unsigned long excess;
> struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
> }
> }
>
> -void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +void memcg1_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz;
> struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
> return total;
> }
>
> -unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> +unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> gfp_t gfp_mask,
> unsigned long *total_scanned)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.h b/mm/memcontrol-v1.h
> index 4da6fa561c6d..e37bc7e8d955 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.h
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.h
> @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
> #ifndef __MM_MEMCONTROL_V1_H
> #define __MM_MEMCONTROL_V1_H
>
> -void mem_cgroup_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid);
> -void mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
> +void memcg1_update_tree(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid);
> +void memcg1_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>
> static inline void memcg1_soft_limit_reset(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 003e944f34ea..3479e1af12d5 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
> MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_SOFTLIMIT);
> mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
> if (unlikely(do_softlimit))
> - mem_cgroup_update_tree(memcg, nid);
> + memcg1_update_tree(memcg, nid);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -5610,7 +5610,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>
> vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);
> cancel_work_sync(&memcg->high_work);
> - mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
> + memcg1_remove_from_trees(memcg);
> free_shrinker_info(memcg);
> mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
> }
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 900bad16e506..3d4c681c6d40 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -6186,9 +6186,9 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> * and balancing, not for a memcg's limit.
> */
> nr_soft_scanned = 0;
> - nr_soft_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat,
> - sc->order, sc->gfp_mask,
> - &nr_soft_scanned);
> + nr_soft_reclaimed = memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat,
> + sc->order, sc->gfp_mask,
> + &nr_soft_scanned);
> sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
> sc->nr_scanned += nr_soft_scanned;
> /* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
> @@ -6952,8 +6952,8 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
> /* Call soft limit reclaim before calling shrink_node. */
> sc.nr_scanned = 0;
> nr_soft_scanned = 0;
> - nr_soft_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pgdat, sc.order,
> - sc.gfp_mask, &nr_soft_scanned);
> + nr_soft_reclaimed = memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pgdat, sc.order,
> + sc.gfp_mask, &nr_soft_scanned);
> sc.nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 0:58 [PATCH v2 00/14] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] mm: memcg: introduce memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:05 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] mm: memcg: move soft limit reclaim code to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:06 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] mm: memcg: rename soft limit reclaim-related functions Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:06 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] mm: memcg: move charge migration code to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] mm: memcg: rename charge move-related functions Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] mm: memcg: move legacy memcg event code into memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] mm: memcg: rename memcg_check_events() Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] mm: memcg: move cgroup v1 oom handling code into memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] mm: memcg: rename memcg_oom_recover() Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] mm: memcg: move cgroup v1 interface files to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] mm: memcg: make memcg1_update_tree() static Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] mm: memcg: group cgroup v1 memcg related declarations Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] mm: memcg: put cgroup v1-related members of task_struct under config option Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 7:19 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-26 18:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] MAINTAINERS: add mm/memcontrol-v1.c/h to the list of maintained files Roman Gushchin
2024-06-25 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option Shakeel Butt
2024-06-26 18:07 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Znpsk9yyXmMyA7Vf@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox