From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: kernel crashes when running xfsdump since ~6.4
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:20:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnlkmkDAi2CtgwDF@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00d74f24-c49c-460e-871c-d5af64701306@draconx.ca>
> On 2024-06-20 02:19, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > After upgrading my sparc to 6.9.5 I noticed that attempting to run
> > xfsdump instantly (within a couple seconds) and reliably crashes the
> > kernel. The same problem is also observed on 6.10-rc4.
> [...]
> > 062eacf57ad91b5c272f89dc964fd6dd9715ea7d is the first bad commit
> > commit 062eacf57ad91b5c272f89dc964fd6dd9715ea7d
> > Author: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu Mar 30 21:06:38 2023 +0200
> >
> > mm: vmalloc: remove a global vmap_blocks xarray
>
> I think I might see what is happening here.
>
> On this machine, there are two CPUs numbered 0 and 2 (there is no CPU1).
>
> The per-cpu variables in mm/vmalloc.c are initialized like this, in
> vmalloc_init
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> /* ... */
> vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, i);
> /* initialize stuff in vbq */
> }
>
> This loops over the set bits of cpu_possible_mask, bits 0 and 2 are set,
> so it initializes stuff with i=0 and i=2, skipping i=1 (I added prints to
> confirm this).
>
> Then, in vm_map_ram, with the problematic change it calls the new
> function addr_to_vb_xa, which does this:
>
> int index = (addr / VMAP_BLOCK_SIZE) % num_possible_cpus();
> return &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, index).vmap_blocks;
>
> The num_possible_cpus() function counts the number of set bits in
> cpu_possible_mask, so it returns 2. Thus, index is either 0 or 1, which
> does not correspond to what was initialized (0 or 2). The crash occurs
> when the computed index is 1 in this function. In this case, the
> returned value appears to be garbage (I added prints to confirm this).
>
> If I change addr_to_vb_xa function to this:
>
> int index = ((addr / VMAP_BLOCK_SIZE) & 1) << 1; /* 0 or 2 */
> return &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, index).vmap_blocks;
>
> xfsdump is working again.
>
Could you please test below?
<snip>
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 5d3aa2dc88a8..1733946f7a12 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -5087,7 +5087,13 @@ void __init vmalloc_init(void)
*/
vmap_area_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(vmap_area, SLAB_PANIC);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+ /*
+ * We use "nr_cpu_ids" here because some architectures
+ * may have "gaps" in cpu-possible-mask. It is OK for
+ * per-cpu approaches but is not OK for cases where it
+ * can be used as hashes also.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) {
struct vmap_block_queue *vbq;
struct vfree_deferred *p;
<snip>
Thank you in advance and i really appreciate for finding this
issue!
--
Uladzislau Rezki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-20 6:19 Nick Bowler
2024-06-20 6:37 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-20 14:36 ` Nick Bowler
2024-06-20 18:02 ` Nick Bowler
2024-06-21 3:30 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-21 7:07 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-21 9:44 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-21 10:45 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-21 11:15 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-24 12:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 9:26 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-25 9:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-21 13:42 ` Michael Kelley
2024-06-24 12:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-21 14:02 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-24 12:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 3:30 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-25 10:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 11:40 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-25 12:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 13:02 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-25 15:33 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 15:49 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-25 16:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 20:05 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-26 0:38 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-26 5:12 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-26 9:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-26 10:03 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-26 10:51 ` Baoquan He
2024-06-26 10:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-26 11:30 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-26 11:45 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-26 10:51 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-26 13:34 ` Nick Bowler
2024-06-26 13:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-25 11:19 ` Hailong Liu
2024-06-25 12:41 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-06-24 12:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnlkmkDAi2CtgwDF@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nbowler@draconx.ca \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox