From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: ratelimit oversized kvmalloc warnings instead of once
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:19:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnKGjdw8xkMZG0oX@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618213421.282381-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
On Tue 18-06-24 14:34:21, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> At the moment oversize kvmalloc warnings are triggered once using
> WARN_ON_ONCE() macro. One issue with this approach is that it only
> detects the first abuser and then ignores the remaining abusers which
> complicates detecting all such abusers in a timely manner. The situation
> becomes worse when the repro has low probability and requires production
> traffic and thus require large set of machines to find such abusers. In
> Mera production, this warn once is slowing down the detection of these
> abusers. Simply replace WARN_ON_ONCE with WARN_RATELIMIT.
Long time ago, I've had a patch to do the once_per_callsite WARN. I
cannot find reference at the moment but it used stack depot to note
stacks that have already triggered. Back then there was no reponse on
the ML. Should I try to dig deep and recover it from my archives? I
think this is exactly kind of usecase where it would fit.
> Reported-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/util.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 10f215985fe5..de36344e8d53 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -649,7 +649,8 @@ void *kvmalloc_node_noprof(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>
> /* Don't even allow crazy sizes */
> if (unlikely(size > INT_MAX)) {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
> + WARN_RATELIMIT(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN), "size = %zu > INT_MAX",
> + size);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 21:34 Shakeel Butt
2024-06-18 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-18 21:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-19 7:19 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-06-19 8:03 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-19 8:30 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-19 8:37 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-19 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-19 17:47 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-19 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-19 19:54 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-19 12:49 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-19 12:51 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-19 17:52 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnKGjdw8xkMZG0oX@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kyle@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox