linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm: memcg: remove redundant seq_buf_has_overflowed()
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:20:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn1LFyO_cww9W758@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a351c609-4968-398a-9316-2ad19d934e9c@huawei.com>

On Thu 27-06-24 16:33:00, xiujianfeng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/6/27 15:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 26-06-24 09:42:32, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> >> Both the end of memory_stat_format() and memcg_stat_format() will call
> >> WARN_ON_ONCE(seq_buf_has_overflowed()). However, memory_stat_format()
> >> is the only caller of memcg_stat_format(), when memcg is on the default
> >> hierarchy, seq_buf_has_overflowed() will be executed twice, so remove
> >> the reduntant one.
> > 
> > Shouldn't we rather remove both? Are they giving us anything useful
> > actually? Would a simpl pr_warn be sufficient? Afterall all we care
> > about is to learn that we need to grow the buffer size because our stats
> > do not fit anymore. It is not really important whether that is an OOM or
> > cgroupfs interface path.
> 
> I did a test, when I removed both of them and added a lot of prints in
> memcg_stat_format() to make the seq_buf overflow, and then cat
> memory.stat in user mode, no OOM occurred, and there were no warning
> logs in the kernel.

The default buffer size is PAGE_SIZE.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-27 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-26  9:42 Xiu Jianfeng
2024-06-27  7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27  8:33   ` xiujianfeng
2024-06-27 11:20     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-06-27 11:43       ` xiujianfeng
2024-06-27 11:54         ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-28  2:20           ` xiujianfeng
2024-06-28  7:09             ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27 11:33   ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-27 11:56     ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-27 12:00       ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-06-27 12:28         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zn1LFyO_cww9W758@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox