From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1A4C27C4F for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 78CDB6B00A0; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 73D016B00A1; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:38:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 62C8C6B00A2; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:38:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5ED6B00A0 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:38:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F7BA0B61 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:38:29 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82226272338.07.6174D69 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364C8C0008 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=uyHdUvob; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of mcgrof@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 198.137.202.133) smtp.mailfrom=mcgrof@infradead.org; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=kernel.org (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1718293106; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=QqcQdAVSX0DGR4a20koQtjFGscN2RD3oSHZsa+S9uOc=; b=GMNY3M8EigX1o+IeAYs2PqjOPdzrsqu3Abq/j85+f50EhttJ5FQt0ccBksvwUqULNgZlut ep17PQGxdpgCUVe7sBL7h4tEOQc3wKBER8uf5cp6QqQfigAqjdTUK7YAvXObPtlUFOoT4f x68Uliw1wcYrSr4coKXFf4/KJFGHyus= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1718293106; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=K/cssIEdUVd+3KUSGt1wlhL0Oo0qVV8ixshkSFkqkH8oCoD0ZMDyL9kKQHqUO0uAH51YHe r5ufFLz9rY7BppvvnEqkS2jln+lv/lMLSjvEPrap1lZeqGPiAo4C/TWDKR3ggg6tiSdVIm 3oxrtIYqNOynSSJUbw74JAhA36mQP7k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=uyHdUvob; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of mcgrof@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 198.137.202.133) smtp.mailfrom=mcgrof@infradead.org; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, DKIM not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=kernel.org (policy=none) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=QqcQdAVSX0DGR4a20koQtjFGscN2RD3oSHZsa+S9uOc=; b=uyHdUvobNQT50e966AtRjS6tNw KoDzyBBRuqsPCQYzqTF/Bmtb59n6/BhVjArn5563FiGMCTcapDCTwG8LbqdbrQkz4RCl8bI73zU0d Y9C/0/ILQkLVjKj1SU9pmyaF7CbV3PGmrlFudbTEOXB+KBS4J6b2Zc5WaVfL+AJd9FpBBeNWLTY5Q N/xRM405+UjnpdPsIM5WJGW7vzJU9lSIOmaAjDrxHlyRXp0t5CiZGuo9cFIdU471ZCECypXJaMRbg trICrD3W/Q5n8RD4aUoE6POLfKUBTK6p4b4oR8gYxKTdcKvEiJNwc4RPvmtCu5YSXlicPGse2TxfC 4KZ5WHgA==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sHmWl-0000000HC76-0vUu; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:38:15 +0000 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:38:15 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: David Hildenbrand , Hugh Dickins , yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de, "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" , david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, chandan.babu@oracle.com, brauner@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hare@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zi Yan , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, gost.dev@samsung.com, cl@os.amperecomputing.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/11] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Message-ID: References: <20240607145902.1137853-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> <20240607145902.1137853-7-kernel@pankajraghav.com> <818f69fa-9dc7-4ca0-b3ab-a667cd1fb16d@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Stat-Signature: hoffi4gtqwxzrheuutcebqx8pincrncc X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 364C8C0008 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-HE-Tag: 1718293107-988647 X-HE-Meta: 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 /0iQG0JW awXCIbCaaC4U2ZoldHj2fyETRcopHqnJz1e7deDKngmgdLaoCD7igYvhXouD5s+niO/ApGvBWFdW7mkIbhUxrmFPlIy3DcuMIYa9PGJXZF6fssWjGmzxiW6w5Vkibfy9sm/jsXD8hfsFr30flKtCPg0tkYmE9Voi+5qTmRXQBDej7OVaSptoWemhpcIMQ6Ksf+bsOYE/KRtwZ1CtpWUtPhP/pGHe8c+xtYctMavVgrutUm2BFEVTSP4W2b1VMySox6r8S/I9fVNzgM5Sj7EFqZKIuuq12YKBm0zi2KXc3dj5qEdITmIRrIJuObl/o22QI/IrLIkDSWgS80ADaqu5FZqIuWQo77ueCxg3y+V8eCxBPoUtralRimz9Iv9Q8UkYQinW13TdFB83Ae3BxbQI/0cFCbCqDaayiodjfOsYX6b1NSFs= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:27:27AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > The case I tested that failed the test was tmpfs with huge pages (not > > large folios). So should we then have this: > > No. OK so this does have a change for tmpfs with huge pages enabled, do we take the position then this is a fix for that? Luis