linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 16/18] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:39:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmqiI5Q8DyyEA0gW@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92a741b0358fc100ad331760181f66e82781052b.1717955559.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 07:55:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On book3s/64, the only user of hugepd is hash in 4k mode.
> 
> All other setups (hash-64, radix-4, radix-64) use leaf PMD/PUD.
> 
> Rework hash-4k to use contiguous PMD and PUD instead.
> 
> In that setup there are only two huge page sizes: 16M and 16G.
> 
> 16M sits at PMD level and 16G at PUD level.
> 
> pte_update doesn't know page size, lets use the same trick as
> hpte_need_flush() to get page size from segment properties. That's
> not the most efficient way but let's do that until callers of
> pte_update() provide page size instead of just a huge flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
...
> +static inline unsigned long hash__pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm,
> +					 unsigned long addr,
> +					 pte_t *ptep, unsigned long clr,
> +					 unsigned long set,
> +					 int huge)
> +{
> +	unsigned long old;
> +
> +	old = hash__pte_update_one(ptep, clr, set);
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES) && huge) {
> +		unsigned int psize = get_slice_psize(mm, addr);
> +		int nb, i;
> +
> +		if (psize == MMU_PAGE_16M)
> +			nb = SZ_16M / PMD_SIZE;
> +		else if (psize == MMU_PAGE_16G)
> +			nb = SZ_16G / PUD_SIZE;
> +		else
> +			nb = 1;

Although that might be a safe default, it might carry consequences down the road?
It might not, but if we reach that, something went wrong, so I would put a
WARN_ON_ONCE at least.

> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ int __hash_page_huge(unsigned long ea, unsigned long access, unsigned long vsid,
>  		/* If PTE permissions don't match, take page fault */
>  		if (unlikely(!check_pte_access(access, old_pte)))
>  			return 1;
> +		/*
> +		 * If hash-4k, hugepages use seeral contiguous PxD entries
> +		 * so bail out and let mm make the page young or dirty
> +		 */
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES)) {
> +			if (!(old_pte & _PAGE_ACCESSED))
> +				return 1;
> +			if ((access & _PAGE_WRITE) && !(old_pte & _PAGE_DIRTY))
> +				return 1;
> +		}

You mentioned that we need to bail out otherwise only the first PxD would be
updated.
In the comment you say that mm will take care of making the page young
or dirty.
Does this mean that the PxDs underneath will not have its bits updated?
 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-13  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10  5:54 [PATCH v5 00/18] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code [SQUASHED] Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-06-11  9:34   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 14:17     ` Peter Xu
2024-06-11 15:08       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 15:20         ` Peter Xu
2024-06-11 16:10           ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 19:00             ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-11 21:43               ` Peter Xu
2024-06-13  7:19               ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-13 16:43                 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-14 14:14                   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 16:53         ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-11 14:50     ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] powerpc/e500: Don't pre-check write access on data TLB error Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:54 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] powerpc/e500: Free r10 for FIND_PTE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:55 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:55 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-06-13  7:39   ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-06-24 14:24     ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-10  5:55 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10  5:55 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZmqiI5Q8DyyEA0gW@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox