From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:08:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmhofWIiMC3I0aMF@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZmhcepJrkDpJ7mSC@x1n>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:17:30AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> Oscar,
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:34:23AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > Which means that they would be caught in the following code:
> >
> > ptl = pmd_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
> > if (ptl) {
> > - 8MB hugepages will be handled here
> > smaps_pmd_entry(pmd, addr, walk);
> > spin_unlock(ptl);
> > }
> > /* pte stuff */
> > ...
>
> Just one quick comment: I think there's one challenge though as this is
> also not a generic "pmd leaf", but a pgtable page underneath. I think it
> means smaps_pmd_entry() won't trivially work here, e.g., it will start to
> do this:
>
> if (pmd_present(*pmd)) {
> page = vm_normal_page_pmd(vma, addr, *pmd);
>
> Here vm_normal_page_pmd() will only work if pmd_leaf() satisfies its
> definition as:
>
> * - It should contain a huge PFN, which points to a huge page larger than
> * PAGE_SIZE of the platform. The PFN format isn't important here.
>
> But now it's a pgtable page, containing cont-ptes. Similarly, I think most
> pmd_*() helpers will stop working there if we report it as a leaf.
Heh, I think I managed to confuse myself.
I do not why but I thought that
static inline pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
{
if (ptep_is_8m_pmdp(mm, addr, ptep))
ptep = pte_offset_kernel((pmd_t *)ptep, 0);
return ptep_get(ptep);
}
would return the address of the pmd for 8MB hugepages, but it will
return the address of the first pte?
Then yeah, this will not work as I thought.
The problem is that we do not have spare bits for 8xx to mark these ptes
as cont-ptes or mark them pte as 8MB, so I do not see a clear path on how
we could remove huge_ptep_get for 8xx.
I am really curious though how we handle that for THP? Or THP on 8xx
does not support that size?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 5:54 [PATCH v5 00/18] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code [SQUASHED] Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-06-11 9:34 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 14:17 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-11 15:08 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-06-11 15:20 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-11 16:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 19:00 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-11 21:43 ` Peter Xu
2024-06-13 7:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-13 16:43 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-14 14:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-11 16:53 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-11 14:50 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] powerpc/e500: Don't pre-check write access on data TLB error Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:54 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] powerpc/e500: Free r10 for FIND_PTE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-06-13 7:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-06-24 14:24 ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-06-10 5:55 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmhofWIiMC3I0aMF@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox