From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, gost.dev@samsung.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
cl@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/11] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:22:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zlz+upnpESvduk7L@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529134509.120826-8-kernel@pankajraghav.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:45:05PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
>
> iomap_dio_zero() will pad a fs block with zeroes if the direct IO size
> < fs block size. iomap_dio_zero() has an implicit assumption that fs block
> size < page_size. This is true for most filesystems at the moment.
>
> If the block size > page size, this will send the contents of the page
> next to zero page(as len > PAGE_SIZE) to the underlying block device,
> causing FS corruption.
>
> iomap is a generic infrastructure and it should not make any assumptions
> about the fs block size and the page size of the system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
> ---
>
> After disucssing a bit in LSFMM about this, it was clear that using a
> PMD sized zero folio might not be a good idea[0], especially in platforms
> with 64k base page size, the huge zero folio can be as high as
> 512M just for zeroing small block sizes in the direct IO path.
>
> The idea to use iomap_init to allocate 64k zero buffer was suggested by
> Dave Chinner as it gives decent tradeoff between memory usage and efficiency.
>
> This is a good enough solution for now as moving beyond 64k block size
> in XFS might take a while. We can work on a more generic solution in the
> future to offer different sized zero folio that can go beyond 64k.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/ZkdcAsENj2mBHh91@casper.infradead.org/
>
> fs/internal.h | 8 ++++++++
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 5 +++++
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 9 +++++++--
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
> index 84f371193f74..18eedbb82c50 100644
> --- a/fs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/internal.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,14 @@ static inline void bdev_cache_init(void)
> int __block_write_begin_int(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
> get_block_t *get_block, const struct iomap *iomap);
>
> +/*
> + * iomap/buffered-io.c
> + */
> +
> +#define ZERO_FSB_SIZE (65536)
> +#define ZERO_FSB_ORDER (get_order(ZERO_FSB_SIZE))
> +extern struct page *zero_fs_block;
This is really iomap direct IO private stuff. It should be visible
anywhere else...
> +
> /*
> * char_dev.c
> */
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index c5802a459334..2c0149c827cd 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct iomap_folio_state {
> };
>
> static struct bio_set iomap_ioend_bioset;
> +struct page *zero_fs_block;
>
> static inline bool ifs_is_fully_uptodate(struct folio *folio,
> struct iomap_folio_state *ifs)
> @@ -1998,6 +1999,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_writepages);
>
> static int __init iomap_init(void)
> {
> + zero_fs_block = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, ZERO_FSB_ORDER);
> + if (!zero_fs_block)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> return bioset_init(&iomap_ioend_bioset, 4 * (PAGE_SIZE / SECTOR_SIZE),
> offsetof(struct iomap_ioend, io_bio),
> BIOSET_NEED_BVECS);
just create an iomap_dio_init() function in iomap/direct-io.c
and call that from here. Then everything can be private to
iomap/direct-io.c...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-02 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 13:44 [PATCH v6 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:44 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-03 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-03 12:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-06-04 9:42 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-03 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-03 12:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-06-04 10:29 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-03 6:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-02 23:22 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-06-04 9:43 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-06-03 6:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-29 13:45 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zlz+upnpESvduk7L@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox