From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 06:12:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlFlRr26AvS6n7p8@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41bf05806501c0091a7d52e118b187416d24a76f.1715971869.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:00:04PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
> to the following error:
I am curious though.
pmd_leaf is only defined in include/linux/pgtable.h for 32bits, and is hardcoded
to false.
I do not see where we change it in previous patches, so is this artificial?
>
> CC arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
> 506 | }
> | ^
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
> 394 | pud_t pud, *pudp;
> | ^~~
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>
> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
This is because 32bits powerpc include pgtable-nopmd.h?
> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> index 59f0d7706d2f..51ee508eeb5b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -390,8 +390,12 @@ pte_t *__find_linux_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long ea,
> bool *is_thp, unsigned *hpage_shift)
> {
> pgd_t *pgdp;
> - p4d_t p4d, *p4dp;
> - pud_t pud, *pudp;
> + p4d_t *p4dp;
> + pud_t *pudp;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + p4d_t p4d;
> + pud_t pud;
> +#endif
> pmd_t pmd, *pmdp;
> pte_t *ret_pte;
> hugepd_t *hpdp = NULL;
> @@ -412,6 +416,7 @@ pte_t *__find_linux_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long ea,
> */
> pgdp = pgdir + pgd_index(ea);
> p4dp = p4d_offset(pgdp, ea);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> p4d = READ_ONCE(*p4dp);
> pdshift = P4D_SHIFT;
>
> @@ -452,6 +457,11 @@ pte_t *__find_linux_pte(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long ea,
>
> pdshift = PMD_SHIFT;
> pmdp = pmd_offset(&pud, ea);
> +#else
> + p4dp = p4d_offset(pgdp, ea);
> + pudp = pud_offset(p4dp, ea);
> + pmdp = pmd_offset(pudp, ea);
I would drop a comment on top explaining that these are no-op for 32bits,
otherwise it might not be obvious to people as why this distiction between 64 and
32bits.
Other than that looks good to me
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-25 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 18:59 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] mm: Provide pagesize to pmd_populate() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 9:01 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 11:57 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] mm: Provide page size to pte_alloc_huge() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] mm: Provide pmd to pte_leaf_size() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 9:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 10:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 9:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 17:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 0:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-21 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 10:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-24 11:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 3:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 3:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:12 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-25 6:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] powerpc/mm: Complement huge_pte_alloc() for all non HUGEPD setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 6:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 10:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] powerpc/64e: Remove unneeded #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500 Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 7:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-24 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] powerpc/64e: Clean up impossible setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] powerpc/e500: Remove enc field from struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:35 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] powerpc/85xx: Switch to 64 bits PGD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 12:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-20 16:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 1:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-22 9:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-18 6:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-23 19:40 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24 4:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-27 14:14 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24 6:31 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlFlRr26AvS6n7p8@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox