linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/14] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:34:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl4a4fK97vaiDxfH@P9FQF9L96D> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528202101.3099300-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>

Johannes, Michal,

friendly ping. Do you have any concerns regarding this patchset?

There is a number of things which can/need to be improved/polished on top,
but I'd really like to land this one first, because rebasing of
such a massive patchset is time-consuming and might also introduce
some silly bugs.

Thanks

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 01:20:52PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Cgroups v2 have been around for a while and many users have fully adopted them,
> so they never use cgroups v1 features and functionality. Yet they have to "pay"
> for the cgroup v1 support anyway:
> 1) the kernel binary contains an unused cgroup v1 code,
> 2) some code paths have additional checks which are not needed,
> 3) some common structures like task_struct and mem_cgroup contain unused
>    cgroup v1-specific members.
> 
> Cgroup v1's memory controller has a number of features that are not supported
> by cgroup v2 and their implementation is pretty much self contained.
> Most notably, these features are: soft limit reclaim, oom handling in userspace,
> complicated event notification system, charge migration. Cgroup v1-specific code
> in memcontrol.c is close to 4k lines in size and it's intervened with generic
> and cgroup v2-specific code. It's a burden on developers and maintainers.
> 
> This patchset aims to solve these problems by:
> 1) moving cgroup v1-specific memcg code to the new mm/memcontrol-v1.c file,
> 2) putting definitions shared by memcontrol.c and memcontrol-v1.c into the
>    mm/memcontrol-v1.h header,
> 3) introducing the CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 config option, turned off by default,
> 4) making memcontrol-v1.c to compile only if CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is set.
> 
> If CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 is not set, cgroup v1 memory controller is still available
> for mounting, however no memory-specific control knobs are present.
> 
> This patchset is based against mm-unstable tree (b610f75d19a34),
> however a version based on mm-stable can be found here:
>   https://github.com/rgushchin/linux/tree/memcontrol_v1.1-stable .
> 
> rfc:
>   https://lwn.net/Articles/973082/
> 
> v1:
>   - switched to CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 being off by default based on LSFMMBPF
>     discussion [1]
>   - switched to memcg1_ prefix (Johannes)
>   - many minor fixes
>   - dropped patches which put struct memcg members under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
>     (will post as a separate patchset)
> 
> [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/974575/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-03 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-28 20:20 Roman Gushchin
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] mm: memcg: introduce memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:42   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-04  3:58     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] mm: memcg: move soft limit reclaim code to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:42   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] mm: memcg: rename soft limit reclaim-related functions Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:43   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] mm: memcg: move charge migration code to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:44   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] mm: memcg: rename charge move-related functions Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:45   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] mm: memcg: move legacy memcg event code into memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:33   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-04  3:57     ` Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:45   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] mm: memcg: rename memcg_check_events() Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:39   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-01  6:46   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] mm: memcg: move cgroup v1 oom handling code into memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:46   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-01  6:47   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 20:21 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] mm: memcg: rename memcg_oom_recover() Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:48   ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 21:44 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] mm: memcg: move cgroup v1 interface files to memcontrol-v1.c Roman Gushchin
2024-05-28 21:44   ` [PATCH v1 11/14] mm: memcg: make memcg1_update_tree() static Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:48     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 21:44   ` [PATCH v1 12/14] mm: memcg: group cgroup v1 memcg related declarations Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:49     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28 21:44   ` [PATCH v1 13/14] mm: memcg: put cgroup v1-related members of task_struct under config option Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:51     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-02 12:00     ` Lance Yang
2024-06-03 19:13       ` Roman Gushchin
2024-05-28 21:44   ` [PATCH v1 14/14] MAINTAINERS: add mm/memcontrol-v1.c/h to the list of maintained files Roman Gushchin
2024-06-01  6:53     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-06-01  6:48   ` [PATCH v1 10/14] mm: memcg: move cgroup v1 interface files to memcontrol-v1.c Shakeel Butt
2024-06-03 19:34 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2024-06-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option Shakeel Butt
2024-06-07 16:13   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-06-24 22:00     ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zl4a4fK97vaiDxfH@P9FQF9L96D \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox