From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mm_init.c: not always search next deferred_init_pfn from very beginning
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:27:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl1iPjM6E6kiccuO@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531002613.5231-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:26:13AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> In function deferred_init_memmap(), we call
> deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone() to get the next deferred_init_pfn.
> But we always search it from the very beginning.
>
> Since we save the index in i, we can leverage this to search from i next
> time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memblock.h | 19 -------------------
> mm/mm_init.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 6cf18dc2b4d0..45cac33334c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -299,25 +299,6 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
> void __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long *out_spfn,
> unsigned long *out_epfn);
> -/**
> - * for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone - iterate through zone specific free
> - * memblock areas
> - * @i: u64 used as loop variable
> - * @zone: zone in which all of the memory blocks reside
> - * @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
> - * @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
> - *
> - * Walks over free (memory && !reserved) areas of memblock in a specific
> - * zone. Available once memblock and an empty zone is initialized. The main
> - * assumption is that the zone start, end, and pgdat have been associated.
> - * This way we can use the zone to determine NUMA node, and if a given part
> - * of the memblock is valid for the zone.
> - */
> -#define for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(i, zone, p_start, p_end) \
> - for (i = 0, \
> - __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end); \
> - i != U64_MAX; \
> - __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end))
>
> /**
> * for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from - iterate through zone specific
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index d05a4c38310f..ec17bf93f946 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -2023,18 +2023,21 @@ static unsigned long __init deferred_init_pages(struct zone *zone,
> * return false indicating there are no valid ranges left.
> */
> static bool __init
> -deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *i, struct zone *zone,
> +deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from(u64 *i, struct zone *zone,
I don't think renaming this function is useful.
The comment above it, on the other hand, needs update.
> unsigned long *spfn, unsigned long *epfn,
> unsigned long first_init_pfn)
> {
> - u64 j;
> + u64 j = *i;
> +
> + if (j == 0)
> + __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&j, zone, spfn, epfn);
>
> /*
> * Start out by walking through the ranges in this zone that have
> * already been initialized. We don't need to do anything with them
> * so we just need to flush them out of the system.
> */
> - for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(j, zone, spfn, epfn) {
> + for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from(j, zone, spfn, epfn) {
> if (*epfn <= first_init_pfn)
> continue;
> if (*spfn < first_init_pfn)
> @@ -2106,9 +2109,9 @@ deferred_init_memmap_chunk(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> {
> unsigned long spfn, epfn;
> struct zone *zone = arg;
> - u64 i;
> + u64 i = 0;
>
> - deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn, start_pfn);
> + deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn, start_pfn);
>
> /*
> * Initialize and free pages in MAX_PAGE_ORDER sized increments so that
> @@ -2137,7 +2140,7 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data)
> unsigned long start = jiffies;
> struct zone *zone;
> int max_threads;
> - u64 i;
> + u64 i = 0;
>
> /* Bind memory initialisation thread to a local node if possible */
> if (!cpumask_empty(cpumask))
> @@ -2168,7 +2171,7 @@ static int __init deferred_init_memmap(void *data)
>
> max_threads = deferred_page_init_max_threads(cpumask);
>
> - while (deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn, first_init_pfn)) {
> + while (deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn, first_init_pfn)) {
> first_init_pfn = ALIGN(epfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> struct padata_mt_job job = {
> .thread_fn = deferred_init_memmap_chunk,
> @@ -2212,7 +2215,7 @@ bool __init deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
> unsigned long first_deferred_pfn = pgdat->first_deferred_pfn;
> unsigned long spfn, epfn, flags;
> unsigned long nr_pages = 0;
> - u64 i;
> + u64 i = 0;
>
> /* Only the last zone may have deferred pages */
> if (zone_end_pfn(zone) != pgdat_end_pfn(pgdat))
> @@ -2230,7 +2233,7 @@ bool __init deferred_grow_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order)
> }
>
> /* If the zone is empty somebody else may have cleared out the zone */
> - if (!deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn,
> + if (!deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from(&i, zone, &spfn, &epfn,
> first_deferred_pfn)) {
> pgdat->first_deferred_pfn = ULONG_MAX;
> pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 0:26 [PATCH 1/3] mm/mm_init.c: get the highest zone directly Wei Yang
2024-05-31 0:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/mm_init.c: use deferred_init_mem_pfn_range_in_zone() to decide loop condition Wei Yang
2024-06-03 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-05-31 0:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/mm_init.c: not always search next deferred_init_pfn from very beginning Wei Yang
2024-06-03 6:27 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2024-06-03 20:16 ` Wei Yang
2024-06-05 5:29 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-03 6:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/mm_init.c: get the highest zone directly Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zl1iPjM6E6kiccuO@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox