linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
	"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ying.huang@intel.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	<fengwei.yin@intel.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [memcg]  70a64b7919: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -11.9% regression
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 10:43:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkq41w8YKCaKQAGk@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jg2rpsollyfck5drndajpxtqbjtigtuxql4j5s66egygfrcjqa@okdilkpx5v5e>

hi, Shakeel,

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 10:20:28AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 05:14:39PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> > hi, Shakeel,
> > 
> > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 11:28:10PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:56:30PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > kernel test robot noticed a -11.9% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops on:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > commit: 70a64b7919cbd6c12306051ff2825839a9d65605 ("memcg: dynamically allocate lruvec_stats")
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the report. Can you please run the same benchmark but with
> > > the full series (of 8 patches) or at least include the ff48c71c26aa
> > > ("memcg: reduce memory for the lruvec and memcg stats").
> > 
> > while this bisect, ff48c71c26aa has been checked. it has silimar data as
> > 70a64b7919 (a little worse actually)
> > 
> > 59142d87ab03b8ff 70a64b7919cbd6c12306051ff28 ff48c71c26aaefb090c108d8803
> > ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> >          %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change         %stddev
> >              \          |                \          |                \
> >      91713           -11.9%      80789           -13.2%      79612        will-it-scale.per_process_ops
> > 
> > 
> > ok, we will run tests on tip of the series which should be below if I understand
> > it correctly.
> > 
> > * a94032b35e5f9 memcg: use proper type for mod_memcg_state
> > 
> > 
> 
> Thanks a lot Oliver. One question: what is the filesystem mounted at
> /tmp on your test machine? I just wanted to make sure I run the test
> with minimal changes from your setup.

we don't have specific partition for /tmp, just use tmpfs

tmp on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,relatime)


BTW, the test on a94032b35e5f9 finished, still have similar score to 70a64b7919

=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
  gcc-13/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/100%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-skl-fpga01/page_fault2/will-it-scale

59142d87ab03b8ff 70a64b7919cbd6c12306051ff28 ff48c71c26aaefb090c108d8803 a94032b35e5f97dc1023030d929
---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
         %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \          |                \          |                \
     91713           -11.9%      80789           -13.2%      79612           -13.0%      79833        will-it-scale.per_process_ops



> 
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > Shakeel
> > > 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-20  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-17  5:56 kernel test robot
2024-05-17 23:38 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-05-18  6:28 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-19  9:14   ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-19 17:20     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-20  2:43       ` Oliver Sang [this message]
2024-05-20  3:49         ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-21  2:43           ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-22  4:18             ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-23  7:48               ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-23 16:47                 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-24  7:45                   ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-24 18:06                     ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-28  6:30                       ` Shakeel Butt
2024-05-30  6:17                         ` Oliver Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zkq41w8YKCaKQAGk@xsang-OptiPlex-9020 \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox