linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 14:06:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zjtqqs_ImPIn7I-B@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f965887-19b5-47bf-98ca-d40b3ec05e75@oracle.com>

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:54:10AM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
> I actually managed to hit the re-access case with an older version of Linux
> -
> 
> MCE occurred, but unmap failed,  no SIGBUS and test process re-access
> 
> the same address over and over (hence MCE after MCE), as the CPU
> 
> was unable to make forward progress.   In reality, this issue is fixed with
> 
> kill_accessing_processes().  The comment for this patch refers to comment
> made

So we get a faulty page and we try to unmap it from all processes that
might have it mapped in their pgtables.
Prior to this patch we would kill the processes right away and now we
deliver a SIGBUS.

Seems safe as upon-reaccesing kill_accessing_process() will be called
for already hwpoisoned pages.

I think the changelog could be made more explicit about this scenario
and state the role of kill_accessing_process more clear.

With that: Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-01 23:24 [PATCH 0/3] Enhance soft hwpoison handling and injection Jane Chu
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed Jane Chu
2024-05-07  9:02   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-07 17:54     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08 12:06       ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-08 16:51         ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  7:47   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 16:58     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09  2:54   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-09 16:40     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/madvise: Add MF_ACTION_REQUIRED to madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) Jane Chu
2024-05-05  7:02   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-06 19:54     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  7:58       ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-01 23:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure: send SIGBUS in the event of thp split fail Jane Chu
2024-05-05  7:00   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-06 20:26     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  8:08       ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 17:45         ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09  8:30           ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-09 15:34             ` Jane Chu
2024-05-10  2:59               ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-10  3:18                 ` Jane Chu
2024-05-08  9:03   ` Miaohe Lin
2024-05-08 16:56     ` Jane Chu
2024-05-09  8:52       ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zjtqqs_ImPIn7I-B@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox