From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
zokeefe@google.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 24/34] ext4: implement buffered write iomap path
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 18:33:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjH+QFVXLlcDkSdh@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjH5Ia+dWGss5Duv@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 06:11:13PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:29:38PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> > From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> >
> > Implement buffered write iomap path, use ext4_da_map_blocks() to map
> > delalloc extents and add ext4_iomap_get_blocks() to allocate blocks if
> > delalloc is disabled or free space is about to run out.
> >
> > Note that we always allocate unwritten extents for new blocks in the
> > iomap write path, this means that the allocation type is no longer
> > controlled by the dioread_nolock mount option. After that, we could
> > postpone the i_disksize updating to the writeback path, and drop journal
> > handle in the buffered dealloc write path completely.
.....
> > +/*
> > + * Drop the staled delayed allocation range from the write failure,
> > + * including both start and end blocks. If not, we could leave a range
> > + * of delayed extents covered by a clean folio, it could lead to
> > + * inaccurate space reservation.
> > + */
> > +static int ext4_iomap_punch_delalloc(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > + loff_t length)
> > +{
> > + ext4_es_remove_extent(inode, offset >> inode->i_blkbits,
> > + DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(length, EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(inode->i_sb)));
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int ext4_iomap_buffered_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > + loff_t length, ssize_t written,
> > + unsigned int flags,
> > + struct iomap *iomap)
> > +{
> > + handle_t *handle;
> > + loff_t end;
> > + int ret = 0, ret2;
> > +
> > + /* delalloc */
> > + if (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_EXT4_DELALLOC) {
> > + ret = iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc(inode, iomap,
> > + offset, length, written, ext4_iomap_punch_delalloc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + ext4_warning(inode->i_sb,
> > + "Failed to clean up delalloc for inode %lu, %d",
> > + inode->i_ino, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> Why are you creating a delalloc extent for the write operation and
> then immediately deleting it from the extent tree once the write
> operation is done?
Ignore this, I mixed up the ext4_iomap_punch_delalloc() code
directly above with iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc().
In hindsight, iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc() is poorly
named, as it is handling a short write situation which requires
newly allocated delalloc blocks to be punched.
iomap_file_buffered_write_finish() would probably be a better name
for it....
> Also, why do you need IOMAP_F_EXT4_DELALLOC? Isn't a delalloc iomap
> set up with iomap->type = IOMAP_DELALLOC? Why can't that be used?
But this still stands - the first thing
iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc() is:
if (iomap->type != IOMAP_DELALLOC)
return 0;
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-01 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 14:29 [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 00/34] ext4: use iomap for regular file's buffered IO path and enable large folio Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] ext4: factor out a common helper to query extent map Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] ext4: check the extent status again before inserting delalloc block Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 6:51 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 12:19 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-05-01 22:49 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-02 4:11 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-05-06 3:49 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] ext4: trim delalloc extent Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 14:31 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-05-06 6:15 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] ext4: drop iblock parameter Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 14:41 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] ext4: make ext4_es_insert_delayed_block() insert multi-blocks Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] ext4: make ext4_da_reserve_space() reserve multi-clusters Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] ext4: factor out check for whether a cluster is allocated Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] ext4: make ext4_insert_delayed_block() insert multi-blocks Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] ext4: make ext4_da_map_blocks() buffer_head unaware Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/34] ext4: factor out ext4_map_create_blocks() to allocate new blocks Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/34] ext4: optimize the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE flag set Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/34] ext4: don't set EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED on allocated blocks Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/34] ext4: let __revise_pending() return newly inserted pendings Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/34] ext4: count removed reserved blocks for delalloc only extent entry Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/34] ext4: update delalloc data reserve spcae in ext4_es_insert_extent() Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/34] ext4: drop ext4_es_delayed_clu() Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/34] ext4: use ext4_map_query_blocks() in ext4_map_blocks() Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/34] ext4: drop ext4_es_is_delonly() Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/34] ext4: drop all delonly descriptions Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/34] ext4: use reserved metadata blocks when splitting extent on endio Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/34] ext4: introduce seq counter for the extent status entry Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/34] ext4: add a new iomap aops for regular file's buffered IO path Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/34] ext4: implement buffered read iomap path Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/34] ext4: implement buffered write " Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 8:11 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-01 8:33 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-05-06 11:44 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-06 23:19 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-07 5:10 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-06 11:21 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/34] ext4: implement writeback " Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/34] ext4: implement mmap " Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 27/34] ext4: implement zero_range " Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 9:40 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-06 12:33 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 28/34] ext4: writeback partial blocks before zeroing out range Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 29/34] ext4: fall back to buffer_head path for defrag Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 9:32 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-06 13:05 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 30/34] ext4: partial enable iomap for regular file's buffered IO path Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 31/34] filemap: support disable large folios on active inode Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 32/34] ext4: enable large folio for regular file with iomap buffered IO path Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 33/34] ext4: don't mark IOMAP_F_DIRTY for buffer write Zhang Yi
2024-05-01 9:27 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-06 14:02 ` Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v4 34/34] ext4: add mount option for buffered IO iomap path Zhang Yi
2024-04-11 1:12 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 00/34] ext4: use iomap for regular file's buffered IO path and enable large folio Zhang Yi
2024-04-24 8:12 ` Zhang Yi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-10 13:27 [RFC " Zhang Yi
2024-04-10 13:28 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/34] ext4: implement buffered write iomap path Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjH+QFVXLlcDkSdh@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox