From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com, jack@suse.cz,
surenb@google.com, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, mhocko@suse.cz,
vbabka@suse.cz, yuzhao@google.com, yu.ma@intel.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:51:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiiPxfN9jVPwXE6j@snowbird> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0145f5db-1adf-46d1-1a2e-41230ab1e462@huawei.com>
Hi Peng,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:29:25PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> On 2024/4/18 22:20, Peng Zhang wrote:
>
> Any suggestions or opinions are welcome. Could someone please review
> this patch series?
> Thanks!
>
Sorry, I haven't been very active lately. This is what I remember
discussing a while back. I'll take a close look tomorrow.
Thanks,
Dennis
> > From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> >
> > Since commit f1a7941243c1 ("mm: convert mm's rss stats into
> > percpu_counter"), the rss_stats have converted into percpu_counter,
> > which convert the error margin from (nr_threads * 64) to approximately
> > (nr_cpus ^ 2). However, the new percpu allocation in mm_init() causes a
> > performance regression on fork/exec/shell. Even after commit 14ef95be6f55
> > ("kernel/fork: group allocation/free of per-cpu counters for mm struct"),
> > the performance of fork/exec/shell is still poor compared to previous
> > kernel versions.
> >
> > To mitigate performance regression, we delay the allocation of percpu
> > memory for rss_stats. Therefore, we convert mm's rss stats to use
> > percpu_counter atomic mode. For single-thread processes, rss_stat is in
> > atomic mode, which reduces the memory consumption and performance
> > regression caused by using percpu. For multiple-thread processes,
> > rss_stat is switched to the percpu mode to reduce the error margin.
> > We convert rss_stats from atomic mode to percpu mode only when the
> > second thread is created.
> >
> > After lmbench test, we can get 2% ~ 4% performance improvement
> > for lmbench fork_proc/exec_proc/shell_proc and 6.7% performance
> > improvement for lmbench page_fault (before batch mode[1]).
> >
> > The test results are as follows:
> > base base+revert base+this patch
> >
> > fork_proc 416.3ms 400.0ms (3.9%) 398.6ms (4.2%)
> > exec_proc 2095.9ms 2061.1ms (1.7%) 2047.7ms (2.3%)
> > shell_proc 3028.2ms 2954.7ms (2.4%) 2961.2ms (2.2%)
> > page_fault 0.3603ms 0.3358ms (6.8%) 0.3361ms (6.7%)
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240412064751.119015-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
> >
> > ChangeLog:
> > v2->v1:
> > - Convert rss_stats from atomic mode to percpu mode only when
> > the second thread is created per Jan Kara.
> > - Compared with v1, the performance data may be different due to
> > different test machines.
> >
> > ZhangPeng (2):
> > percpu_counter: introduce atomic mode for percpu_counter
> > mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode
> >
> > include/linux/mm.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > include/trace/events/kmem.h | 4 +--
> > kernel/fork.c | 18 +++++++-----
> > lib/percpu_counter.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > 5 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> --
> Best Regards,
> Peng
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 14:20 Peng Zhang
2024-04-18 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] percpu_counter: introduce atomic mode for percpu_counter Peng Zhang
2024-04-18 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
2024-04-19 2:55 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-26 8:11 ` Dennis Zhou
2024-04-29 7:45 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-18 14:20 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mm: convert mm's rss stats to use atomic mode Peng Zhang
2024-04-19 2:30 ` Rongwei Wang
2024-04-19 3:32 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-20 3:13 ` Rongwei Wang
2024-04-20 8:44 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-05-16 11:50 ` Kairui Song
2024-05-16 15:14 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-05-17 3:29 ` Kairui Song
2024-05-17 18:08 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-05-19 14:13 ` Dennis Zhou
2024-04-24 4:29 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] " zhangpeng (AS)
2024-04-24 4:51 ` Dennis Zhou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiiPxfN9jVPwXE6j@snowbird \
--to=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yu.ma@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox