From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove meaningless calculation of zone->managed_pages in free_area_init_core()
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:46:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgWCzx7+OxPgFIaU@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgU9_zpuIOu2b_gT@kernel.org>
On 03/28/24 at 11:53am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 04:32:38PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 03/25/24 at 10:56pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * Set an approximate value for lowmem here, it will be adjusted
> > > - * when the bootmem allocator frees pages into the buddy system.
> > > - * And all highmem pages will be managed by the buddy system.
> > > + * Initialize zone->managed_pages as 0 , it will be reset
> > > + * when memblock allocator frees pages into buddy system.
> > > */
> > > - zone_init_internals(zone, j, nid, freesize);
> > > + zone_init_internals(zone, j, nid, 0);
> >
> > Here, we should initialize zone->managed_pages as zone->present_pages
> > because later page_group_by_mobility_disabled need be set according to
> > zone->managed_pages. Otherwise page_group_by_mobility_disabled will be
> > set to 1 always. I will sent out v3.
>
> With zone->managed_pages set to zone->present_pages we won't account for
> the reserved memory for initialization of page_group_by_mobility_disabled.
The old zone->managed_pages didn't account for the reserved pages
either. It's calculated by (zone->present_pages - memmap_pages). memmap
pages only is only a very small portion, e.g on x86_64, 4K page size,
assuming size of struct page is 64, then it's 1/64 of system memory.
On arm64, 64K page size, it's 1/1024 of system memory.
And about the setting of page_group_by_mobility_disabled, the compared
value pageblock_nr_pages * MIGRATE_TYPES which is very small. On x86_64,
it's 4M*6=24M; on arm64 with 64K size and 128M*6=768M which should be
the biggest among ARCH-es.
if (vm_total_pages < (pageblock_nr_pages * MIGRATE_TYPES))
page_group_by_mobility_disabled = 1;
else
page_group_by_mobility_disabled = 0;
So page_group_by_mobility_disabled could be set to 1 only on system with
very little memory which is very rarely seen. And setting
zone->managed_pages as zone->present_pages is very close to its old
value: (zone->present_pages - memmap_pages). Here we don't need be very
accurate, just a rough value.
>
> As watermarks are still not initialized at the time build_all_zonelists()
> is called, we may use nr_all_pages - nr_kernel_pages instead of
> nr_free_zone_pages(), IMO.
nr_all_pages should be fine if we take this way. nr_kernel_pages is a
misleading name, it's all low memory pages excluding kernel reserved
apges. nr_all_pages is all memory pages including highmema and exluding
kernel reserved pages.
Both is fine to me. The first one is easier, simply setting
zone->managed_pages as zone->present_pages. The 2nd way is a little more
accurate.
>
> > From a17b0921b4bd00596330f61ee9ea4b82386a9fed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:20:15 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm/mm_init.c: set zone's ->managed_pages as ->present_pages
> > for now
> > Content-type: text/plain
> >
> > Because page_group_by_mobility_disabled need be set according to zone's
> > managed_pages later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/mm_init.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> > index cc24e7958c0c..dd875f943cbb 100644
> > --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> > @@ -1561,7 +1561,7 @@ static void __init free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> > * Initialize zone->managed_pages as 0 , it will be reset
> > * when memblock allocator frees pages into buddy system.
> > */
> > - zone_init_internals(zone, j, nid, 0);
> > + zone_init_internals(zone, j, nid, zone->present_pages);
> >
> > if (!size)
> > continue;
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
> >
> > >
> > > if (!size)
> > > continue;
> > > @@ -1915,6 +1878,7 @@ void __init free_area_init(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> > > check_for_memory(pgdat);
> > > }
> > >
> > > + calc_nr_kernel_pages();
> > > memmap_init();
> > >
> > > /* disable hash distribution for systems with a single node */
> > > --
> > > 2.41.0
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 14:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/mm_init.c: refactor free_area_init_core() Baoquan He
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86: remove unneeded memblock_find_dma_reserve() Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove the useless dma_reserve Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/mm_init.c: add new function calc_nr_all_pages() Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-26 13:49 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-27 15:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove meaningless calculation of zone->managed_pages in free_area_init_core() Baoquan He
2024-03-27 15:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 8:32 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-28 9:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 14:46 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-03-28 9:12 ` [PATCH v3 " Baoquan He
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove unneeded calc_memmap_size() Baoquan He
2024-03-27 16:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 1:24 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove arch_reserved_kernel_pages() Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:41 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgWCzx7+OxPgFIaU@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox