From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
gost.dev@samsung.com, chandan.babu@oracle.com, hare@suse.de,
mcgrof@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:19:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgHOK9T2K9HKkju1@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313170253.2324812-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:02:42PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> This is the third version of the series that enables block size > page size
> (Large Block Size) in XFS. The context and motivation can be seen in cover
> letter of the RFC v1[1]. We also recorded a talk about this effort at LPC [3],
> if someone would like more context on this effort.
Thank you. This is a lot better.
I'm still trying to understand your opinion on the contents of the
file_ra_state. Is it supposed to be properly aligned at all times, or
do we work with it in the terms of "desired number of pages" and then
force it to conform to the minimum-block-size reality right at the end?
Because you seem to be doing both at various points.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 17:02 Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm: Support order-1 folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 8:44 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-15 13:21 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 18:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 8:56 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-26 9:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 9:44 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 10:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 10:06 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 10:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 13:41 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-26 15:11 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 13:08 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-04-22 11:03 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] readahead: round up file_ra_state->ra_pages to mapping_min_nrpages Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm: do not split a folio if it has minimum folio order requirement Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 16:10 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-26 16:23 ` Zi Yan
2024-03-26 16:33 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 16:38 ` Zi Yan
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-26 9:53 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-13 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-03-25 19:19 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-03-26 9:53 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-26 15:06 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-03-26 14:54 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgHOK9T2K9HKkju1@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox