From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F6ACD1284 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DAF056B00A4; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:40:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D5EF76B00A5; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:40:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C26166B00A6; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:40:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40106B00A4 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:40:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684C91603E9 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:40:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81973469760.17.9F95A45 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9469C12001E for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Ak+qMH5K; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of tony.luck@intel.com designates 198.175.65.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tony.luck@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1712273998; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=2LptFsljNmALYz+FXXxOBQDcNrhi0MabkRdCDQtOhnA=; b=UfNMbL1isIcmMItbFh139wchwBQ7gkgzAaj4zh0cH5doItxZiB4iqexjxg0H5agUpEmhxZ KOwS/LW0iVyAuO/C7rBBhdv2Cq/tBufBXfgo9QBXYicHFaztGTtPre1NwE7Urjz7wUwZik acR4ZQmVSTZsNYH7v/cx2bjkq8pRpHU= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1712273998; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=csJFoJY9k9QHEjI2dawg24VGLg+oGwcNoV73dvv1PMgUoi0iYEWk90yh/+7NJnun+usDM5 CKmHlLoBEtg18F70uPvdHrbqyuk8P3YJ/68IzYI/ZbxuNxW0SRFqHM6WhiKBQl4P6us7RS l1J0Ve4aIAJ/exmDAFMEy4wtAwP8aas= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Ak+qMH5K; spf=pass (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of tony.luck@intel.com designates 198.175.65.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tony.luck@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712273998; x=1743809998; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=6HKfD/8wmlZgXYXrjxJELPl80JlkIWJruUR23ZSPDdI=; b=Ak+qMH5KPovpxA2O45SrU/WxIf6U0xtAQDpoyWF7Cfc00CFJqNVDo1Gi 66xk7sJ8Za3f58831sQeOly3SXs1vrY/W4u+PuN16EXJ43Mh+KbzRoZ1j CLN/f7aKmdnci0Bkacz8176AXT/mj5gc6nBWjbB/gQpaJlkwTdqNfrBge OGWEQKAyRLPBbOKJeqZmnxtmqtNj+eoWuhqngsGej9E35CPl55bl6tuzl E6YxUcZV+CQbTMDuPzIq9p9v/lb4QzlxM7Dde5rV1gOFqtTNTXEqNo/XF /B+rMuW75G4CQodl12Uoo8Jgz7FEZibPNXFMkHsNifyDleQOmbO2GuNds g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oqJkWDbASz61b0LvYNfM+Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9tCnQ8/RQbS2GbP9KeXTnQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11034"; a="7695100" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,180,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7695100" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Apr 2024 16:39:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: am/1XBW/SAuPaS37RMPlYg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0IaJQNE3SrSq6TfqMkDnkg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,180,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="23616329" Received: from agluck-desk3.sc.intel.com (HELO agluck-desk3) ([172.25.222.105]) by fmviesa004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Apr 2024 16:39:55 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:39:53 -0700 From: Tony Luck To: Borislav Petkov , Yazen Ghannam , Miaohe Lin , Naoya Horiguchi , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Machine check recovery broken in v6.9-rc1 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9469C12001E X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: g9j4pfhzkijtwzwcjiw83m9cod9mixss X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-HE-Tag: 1712273997-574191 X-HE-Meta: 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 r5ISO286 mudV/Miz/HxFWQp9zqwuEYOIhLx58gVmv4lX0ppVY4ENlXmDhUR9RKW/RKJ47HCb/aoRJUZPLqS92plKW+E3z5Wa9Br1hW1vTFoXe5FzwkiXdKBC+1OJvCFwTj/VzcxxsbrUMoTTJeLEGSVw= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:05:33PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote: > v6.8 works. v6.9-rc1 fails with: > > kernel BUG at include/linux/swapops.h:119 > > 117 static inline unsigned long swp_offset_pfn(swp_entry_t entry) > 118 { > 119 VM_BUG_ON(!is_pfn_swap_entry(entry)); > 120 return swp_offset(entry) & SWP_PFN_MASK; > 121 } > > > I've messed up the bisection three times now and ended up > pointing at some innocent looking commit. So I wonder if > anyone else has noticed and tried debugging. I think I know why I messed up the bisection. I thought the failure happens every time. But it seems that it only happens most of the time. I must have accidentally marked a build as "good" because I got "lucky" and my test passed. Back to the bisect grindstone :-( -Tony