linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Machine check recovery broken in v6.9-rc1
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:39:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg86SZYDppxffEvv@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zg8kLSl2yAlA3o5D@agluck-desk3>

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:05:33PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> v6.8 works. v6.9-rc1 fails with:
> 
> kernel BUG at include/linux/swapops.h:119
> 
> 117 static inline unsigned long swp_offset_pfn(swp_entry_t entry)
> 118 {
> 119         VM_BUG_ON(!is_pfn_swap_entry(entry));
> 120         return swp_offset(entry) & SWP_PFN_MASK;
> 121 }
> 
> 
> I've messed up the bisection three times now and ended up
> pointing at some innocent looking commit. So I wonder if
> anyone else has noticed and tried debugging.

I think I know why I messed up the bisection. I thought
the failure happens every time. But it seems that it only
happens most of the time. I must have accidentally marked
a build as "good" because I got "lucky" and my test passed.

Back to the bisect grindstone :-(

-Tony


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04 22:05 Tony Luck
2024-04-04 23:39 ` Tony Luck [this message]
2024-04-05  7:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-05 15:05   ` Luck, Tony
2024-04-05 23:58     ` Tony Luck
2024-04-06  2:18       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-04-06  3:54         ` Oscar Salvador
2024-04-06  4:13           ` Oscar Salvador
2024-04-07  0:08             ` Luck, Tony
2024-04-07  3:59               ` Miaohe Lin
2024-04-07  4:51               ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zg86SZYDppxffEvv@agluck-desk3 \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox