From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: mm/gup.c:679:22: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_382' declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG failed
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 07:57:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg6VmKwT6ts2_pVM@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72mVuYbOKmjFUXf5eTeS8a3RoruZfyYvw+_iN+tkd9HzSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Peter, Andrew,
Hi, Miguel,
>
> I am not sure if this is one of the issues that Peter mentioned [1] to
> be resolved or not eventually, but I have spotted this in the last
> couple -next runs for a LLVM=1 loongarch64 defconfig build [2].
It's the one reported after that:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240402190549.GA706730@dev-arch.thelio-3990X
Please try this:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403013249.1418299-4-peterx@redhat.com
It's already included in Andrew's latest mm-unstable, commit 8c9a7c14a7d4.
I don't know how fast it spreads to -next, but assume it'll get there soon
too.
Sorry for the issue!
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZgMzaMu7oILiNLcG@x1n/
> [2]
>
> mm/gup.c:679:22: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_382' declared
> with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG failed
> 679 | unsigned long pfn = pud_pfn(pud);
> | ^
> ./include/linux/pgtable.h:1887:23: note: expanded from macro 'pud_pfn'
> 1887 | #define pud_pfn(x) ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
> | ^
> ./include/linux/build_bug.h:59:21: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG'
> 59 | #define BUILD_BUG() BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "BUILD_BUG failed")
> | ^
> ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> | ^
> note: (skipping 1 expansions in backtrace; use
> -fmacro-backtrace-limit=0 to see all)
> ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:448:2: note: expanded from macro
> '_compiletime_assert'
> 448 | __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
> | ^
> ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:441:4: note: expanded from macro
> '__compiletime_assert'
> 441 | prefix ## suffix(); \
> | ^
> <scratch space>:48:1: note: expanded from here
> 48 | __compiletime_assert_382
> | ^
> 1 error generated.
>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 10:42 Miguel Ojeda
2024-04-04 11:57 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-04-05 13:21 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg6VmKwT6ts2_pVM@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox