linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/mm/pat: fix VM_PAT handling in COW mappings
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:22:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfCrkL-Aieer2EAg@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312181118.318701-1-david@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:11:18PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> PAT handling won't do the right thing in COW mappings: the first PTE
> (or, in fact, all PTEs) can be replaced during write faults to point at
> anon folios. Reliably recovering the correct PFN and cachemode using
> follow_phys() from PTEs will not work in COW mappings.

I guess the first question is: Why do we want to support COW mappings
of VM_PAT areas?  What breaks if we just disallow it?


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-12 18:11 David Hildenbrand
2024-03-12 19:22 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
     [not found]   ` <5bc9de2f-c3ba-46e7-a234-3d3a46e53ba1@redhat.com>
2024-03-14 16:42     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-14 17:12       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-25  2:57       ` mawupeng
2024-03-26  8:33     ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]       ` <922c5f99-1194-4118-9fe2-09b4f4a8cf04@redhat.com>
2024-03-26  8:53         ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-26  8:57           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-01  9:45             ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-02  9:14               ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZfCrkL-Aieer2EAg@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox