From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
surenb@google.com, stefanha@redhat.com, brauner@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
yi.l.liu@intel.com, ardb@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andreyknvl@gmail.com, wangjinchao@xfusion.com, gshan@redhat.com,
shahuang@redhat.com, ricarkol@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
rananta@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, bhe@redhat.com, aniketa@nvidia.com,
cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com,
vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
mochs@nvidia.com, zhiw@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] kvm: arm64: introduce new flag for non-cacheable IO memory
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:27:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdS2yl1kzZv/h+vH@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220072926.6466-2-ankita@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:59:23PM +0530, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
>
> Currently, KVM for ARM64 maps at stage 2 memory that is considered device
> (i.e. it is not RAM) with DEVICE_nGnRE memory attributes; this setting
> overrides (as per the ARM architecture [1]) any device MMIO mapping
> present at stage 1, resulting in a set-up whereby a guest operating
> system cannot determine device MMIO mapping memory attributes on its
> own but it is always overridden by the KVM stage 2 default.
>
> This set-up does not allow guest operating systems to select device
> memory attributes independently from KVM stage-2 mappings
> (refer to [1], "Combining stage 1 and stage 2 memory type attributes"),
> which turns out to be an issue in that guest operating systems
> (e.g. Linux) may request to map devices MMIO regions with memory
> attributes that guarantee better performance (e.g. gathering
> attribute - that for some devices can generate larger PCIe memory
> writes TLPs) and specific operations (e.g. unaligned transactions)
> such as the NormalNC memory type.
>
> The default device stage 2 mapping was chosen in KVM for ARM64 since
> it was considered safer (i.e. it would not allow guests to trigger
> uncontained failures ultimately crashing the machine) but this
> turned out to be asynchronous (SError) defeating the purpose.
>
> Failures containability is a property of the platform and is independent
> from the memory type used for MMIO device memory mappings.
>
> Actually, DEVICE_nGnRE memory type is even more problematic than
> Normal-NC memory type in terms of faults containability in that e.g.
> aborts triggered on DEVICE_nGnRE loads cannot be made, architecturally,
> synchronous (i.e. that would imply that the processor should issue at
> most 1 load transaction at a time - it cannot pipeline them - otherwise
> the synchronous abort semantics would break the no-speculation attribute
> attached to DEVICE_XXX memory).
>
> This means that regardless of the combined stage1+stage2 mappings a
> platform is safe if and only if device transactions cannot trigger
> uncontained failures and that in turn relies on platform capabilities
> and the device type being assigned (i.e. PCIe AER/DPC error containment
> and RAS architecture[3]); therefore the default KVM device stage 2
> memory attributes play no role in making device assignment safer
> for a given platform (if the platform design adheres to design
> guidelines outlined in [3]) and therefore can be relaxed.
>
> For all these reasons, relax the KVM stage 2 device memory attributes
> from DEVICE_nGnRE to Normal-NC.
>
> The NormalNC was chosen over a different Normal memory type default
> at stage-2 (e.g. Normal Write-through) to avoid cache allocation/snooping.
>
> Relaxing S2 KVM device MMIO mappings to Normal-NC is not expected to
> trigger any issue on guest device reclaim use cases either (i.e. device
> MMIO unmap followed by a device reset) at least for PCIe devices, in that
> in PCIe a device reset is architected and carried out through PCI config
> space transactions that are naturally ordered with respect to MMIO
> transactions according to the PCI ordering rules.
>
> Having Normal-NC S2 default puts guests in control (thanks to
> stage1+stage2 combined memory attributes rules [1]) of device MMIO
> regions memory mappings, according to the rules described in [1]
> and summarized here ([(S1) - stage1], [(S2) - stage 2]):
>
> S1 | S2 | Result
> NORMAL-WB | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-WT | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> DEVICE<attr> | NORMAL-NC | DEVICE<attr>
>
> It is worth noting that currently, to map devices MMIO space to user
> space in a device pass-through use case the VFIO framework applies memory
> attributes derived from pgprot_noncached() settings applied to VMAs, which
> result in device-nGnRnE memory attributes for the stage-1 VMM mappings.
>
> This means that a userspace mapping for device MMIO space carried
> out with the current VFIO framework and a guest OS mapping for the same
> MMIO space may result in a mismatched alias as described in [2].
>
> Defaulting KVM device stage-2 mappings to Normal-NC attributes does not
> change anything in this respect, in that the mismatched aliases would
> only affect (refer to [2] for a detailed explanation) ordering between
> the userspace and GuestOS mappings resulting stream of transactions
> (i.e. it does not cause loss of property for either stream of
> transactions on its own), which is harmless given that the userspace
> and GuestOS access to the device is carried out through independent
> transactions streams.
>
> A Normal-NC flag is not present today. So add a new kvm_pgtable_prot
> (KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC) flag for it, along with its
> corresponding PTE value 0x5 (0b101) determined from [1].
>
> Lastly, adapt the stage2 PTE property setter function
> (stage2_set_prot_attr) to handle the NormalNC attribute.
>
> [1] section D8.5.5 - DDI0487J_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> [2] section B2.8 - DDI0487J_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> [3] sections 1.7.7.3/1.8.5.2/appendix C - DEN0029H_SBSA_7.1.pdf
>
A couple of Link: tags would not hurt in my opinion, lest we forget:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907181459.18145-2-ankita@nvidia.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205033015.10044-1-ankita@nvidia.com
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> index cfdf40f734b1..19278dfe7978 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags {
> * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W: Write permission.
> * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R: Read permission.
> * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE: Device attributes.
> + * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC: Normal noncacheable attributes.
> * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW0: Software bit 0.
> * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW1: Software bit 1.
> * @KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW2: Software bit 2.
> @@ -208,6 +209,7 @@ enum kvm_pgtable_prot {
> KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R = BIT(2),
>
> KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE = BIT(3),
> + KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC = BIT(4),
>
> KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW0 = BIT(55),
> KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_SW1 = BIT(56),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index d82305ab420f..449ca2ff1df6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@
> * Memory types for Stage-2 translation
> */
> #define MT_S2_NORMAL 0xf
> +#define MT_S2_NORMAL_NC 0x5
> #define MT_S2_DEVICE_nGnRE 0x1
>
> /*
> @@ -180,6 +181,7 @@
> * Stage-2 enforces Normal-WB and Device-nGnRE
> */
> #define MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL 6
> +#define MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL_NC 5
> #define MT_S2_FWB_DEVICE_nGnRE 1
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index ab9d05fcf98b..3fae5830f8d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -717,15 +717,29 @@ void kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> static int stage2_set_prot_attr(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot,
> kvm_pte_t *ptep)
> {
> - bool device = prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE;
> - kvm_pte_t attr = device ? KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, DEVICE_nGnRE) :
> - KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL);
> + kvm_pte_t attr;
> u32 sh = KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_SH_IS;
>
> + switch (prot & (KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE |
> + KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC)) {
> + case KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE | KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + case KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE:
> + if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + attr = KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, DEVICE_nGnRE);
> + break;
> + case KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC:
> + if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + attr = KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL_NC);
> + break;
> + default:
> + attr = KVM_S2_MEMATTR(pgt, NORMAL);
> + }
> +
> if (!(prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X))
> attr |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN;
> - else if (device)
> - return -EINVAL;
>
> if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R)
> attr |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 7:29 [PATCH v8 0/4] kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for " ankita
2024-02-20 7:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] kvm: arm64: introduce new flag for non-cacheable " ankita
2024-02-20 12:21 ` Will Deacon
2024-02-20 14:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2024-02-21 6:01 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20 7:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] mm: introduce new flag to indicate wc safe ankita
2024-02-20 8:26 ` Zhi Wang
2024-02-20 8:51 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20 9:07 ` Zhi Wang
2024-02-20 9:08 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20 9:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-20 9:33 ` Zhi Wang
2024-02-20 9:40 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-20 7:29 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] kvm: arm64: set io memory s2 pte as normalnc for vfio pci device ankita
2024-02-23 17:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-20 7:29 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] vfio: convey kvm that the vfio-pci device is wc safe ankita
2024-02-20 9:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-20 12:11 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-02-22 20:52 ` Alex Williamson
2024-02-23 17:02 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] kvm: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdS2yl1kzZv/h+vH@lpieralisi \
--to=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=wangjinchao@xfusion.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox