From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: hapter@420blaze.it, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c: rationale for 0x40000000 for MAP_32BIT's start address?
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:43:41 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcmF3SrTACMULEPb@archie.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5c2f06ba401cdf13bc87749341b1605@420blaze.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1892 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 08:52:45AM +0000, hapter@420blaze.it wrote:
> I've found that passing in MAP_32BIT for mmap() will always return an
> address above 0x40000000. The problem seems to lie in
From one gigabyte up?
> arch/x86/kernek/sys_x86_64.c, where the following comment is the only thing
> close to a hint(Line 100):
>
> /* This is usually used needed to map code in small
> model, so it needs to be in the first 31bit. Limit
> it to that. This means we need to move the
> unmapped base down for this case. This can give
> conflicts with the heap, but we assume that glibc
> malloc knows how to fall back to mmap. Give it 1GB
> of playground for now. -AK */
>
> Unfortunately this does not supply a rationale for starting from 0x40000000,
> which seems very arbitrary, and the git commit has been there since the
> beginning of time (i.e. as far the the git history goes), so the git blame
> has not helped much to clarify it. I was also not able to find who "AK" was.
That was from commit 717db2f9f36805 ("[PATCH] x86-64 updates for 2.5.54")
in tglx/history.git repo [1], authored by Andi Kleen. Cc'ing him.
>
> I have found another operating system that provides MAP_32BIT, FreeBSD, to
> not exhibit the same behavior and not cause any execution problems for RWX
> pages allocated below 0x40000000, so it does not seem a technical rationale
> exists either.
>
> mmap will happily return 0x10000 (which seems like the lowest address the
> kernel will map when you supply it as a hint, so I do not see any reason not
> to start the find from 0x10000, or something that isn't as big as
> 0x40000000, which is big enough to impose a significant handicap for
> applications using MAP_32BIT (e.g. JITs that want to use CALL rel32 at all
> times).
>
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a5c2f06ba401cdf13bc87749341b1605@420blaze.it>
2024-02-12 2:43 ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2024-02-12 2:48 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-02-12 7:07 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcmF3SrTACMULEPb@archie.me \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hapter@420blaze.it \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox