linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] mm,page_owner: Implement the tracking of the stacks count
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 22:39:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcabeMCHCkl3Bf6q@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNOoYC93dt5hNmWsC2N8-7GuSp2L6Lb7mNOKxTGhreceUg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 08:45:00AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * stack_depo_get_stack - Get a pointer to a stack struct
> 
> Typo: "depo" -> depot
> 
> I would also write "stack_record struct", because "stack struct" does not exist.

Fixed.

> > + * @handle: Stack depot handle
> > + *
> > + * Return: Returns a pointer to a stack struct
> > + */
> > +struct stack_record *stack_depot_get_stack(depot_stack_handle_t handle);
> 
> I don't know what other usecases there are for this, but I'd want to
> make make sure we give users a big hint to avoid unnecessary uses of
> this function.
> 
> Perhaps we also want to mark it as somewhat internal, e.g. by
> prefixing it with __. So I'd call it __stack_depot_get_stack_record().

Yes, I went with __stack_depot_get_stack_record(), and I updated its doc
in stackdepot.h, mentioning that is only for internal purposes.

> > +static void inc_stack_record_count(depot_stack_handle_t handle)
> > +{
> > +       struct stack_record *stack = stack_depot_get_stack(handle);
> > +
> > +       if (stack)
> > +               refcount_inc(&stack->count);
> > +}
> 
> In the latest stackdepot version in -next, the count is initialized to
> REFCOUNT_SATURATED to warn if a non-refcounted entry is suddenly used
> as a refcounted one. In your case this is intentional and there is no
> risk that the entry will be evicted, so that's ok. But you need to set
> the refcount to 1 somewhere here on the initial stack_depot_save().

Well, I went with something like:

 static void inc_stack_record_count(depot_stack_handle_t handle)
 {
         struct stack_record *stack = __stack_depot_get_stack_record(handle);
 
         if (stack) {
                 /*
                  * New stack_records that do not use STACK_DEPOT_FLAG_GET start
                  * with REFCOUNT_SATURATED to catch spurious increments of their
                  * refcount.
                  * Since we do not use STACK_DEPOT_FLAG_{GET,PUT} API, let us
                  * set a refcount of 1 ourselves.
                  */
                 if (refcount_read(&stack->count) == REFCOUNT_SATURATED)
                         refcount_set(&stack->count, 1);
                 refcount_inc(&stack->count);
         }
 }


-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08 23:45 [PATCH v7 0/4] page_owner: print stacks and their outstanding allocations Oscar Salvador
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] lib/stackdepot: Move stack_record struct definition into the header Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09  7:45   ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:33     ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 17:39   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-10  9:59   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] mm,page_owner: Implement the tracking of the stacks count Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09  7:37   ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09  7:45   ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:39     ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-02-09 21:42       ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:44         ` Marco Elver
2024-02-11 20:42           ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] mm,page_owner: Display all stacks and their count Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09  8:00   ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:52     ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09 23:14       ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-10  7:52         ` Marco Elver
2024-02-11 20:39           ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-12 10:47             ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-02-09 23:14   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-08 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] mm,page_owner: Filter out stacks by a threshold Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09  0:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] page_owner: print stacks and their outstanding allocations Andrew Morton
2024-02-09 21:31   ` Oscar Salvador
2024-02-09  8:03 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-09 21:32   ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZcabeMCHCkl3Bf6q@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox