From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
osalvador@suse.de, david@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: hugetlb: improve the handling of hugetlb allocation failure for freed or in-use hugetlb
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 15:47:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcD1A3gj-Net_I9b@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23814ccce5dd3cd30fd67aa692fd0bf3514b0166.1707137359.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon 05-02-24 20:50:51, Baolin Wang wrote:
> When handling the freed hugetlb or in-use hugetlb, we should ignore the
> failure of alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio() to dissolve the old hugetlb successfully,
> since we did not use the new allocated hugetlb in this 2 cases. Moreover,
> moving the allocation into the free hugetlb handling branch.
The changelog is a bit hard for me to understand. What about the
following instead?
alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio preallocates a new huge page before it
takes hugetlb_lock. In 3 out of 4 cases the page is not really used and
therefore the newly allocated page is just freed right away. This is
wasteful and it might cause pre-mature failures in those cases.
Address that by moving the allocation down to the only case (hugetlb
page is really in the free pages pool). We need to drop hugetlb_lock
to do so and therefore need to recheck the page state after regaining
it.
The patch is more of a cleanup than an actual fix to an existing
problem. There are no known reports about pre-mature failures.
[...]
> @@ -3075,6 +3063,24 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
> cond_resched();
> goto retry;
> } else {
> + if (!new_folio) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> + /*
> + * Before dissolving the free hugetlb, we need to allocate
> + * a new one for the pool to remain stable. Here, we
> + * allocate the folio and 'prep' it by doing everything
> + * but actually updating counters and adding to the pool.
> + * This simplifies and let us do most of the processing
> + * under the lock.
> + */
This comment is not really needed anymore IMHO.
> + new_folio = alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid,
> + NULL, NULL);
> + if (!new_folio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + __prep_new_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Ok, old_folio is still a genuine free hugepage. Remove it from
> * the freelist and decrease the counters. These will be
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 12:50 Baolin Wang
2024-02-05 14:47 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-02-06 1:01 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcD1A3gj-Net_I9b@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox