linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	willy@infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] A Solution to Re-enable hugetlb vmemmap optimize
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:06:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbKjHHeEdFYY1xR5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240113094436.2506396-1-sunnanyong@huawei.com>

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 05:44:33PM +0800, Nanyong Sun wrote:
> HVO was previously disabled on arm64 [1] due to the lack of necessary
> BBM(break-before-make) logic when changing page tables.
> This set of patches fix this by adding necessary BBM sequence when
> changing page table, and supporting vmemmap page fault handling to
> fixup kernel address translation fault if vmemmap is concurrently accessed.

I'm not keen on this approach. I'm not even sure it's safe. In the
second patch, you take the init_mm.page_table_lock on the fault path but
are we sure this is unlocked when the fault was taken? Basically you can
get a fault anywhere something accesses a struct page.

How often is this code path called? I wonder whether a stop_machine()
approach would be simpler.

Andrew, I'd suggest we drop these patches from the mm tree for the time
being. They haven't received much review from the arm64 folk. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-13  9:44 Nanyong Sun
2024-01-13  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: HVO: introduce helper function to update and flush pgtable Nanyong Sun
2024-01-13  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: mm: HVO: support BBM of vmemmap pgtable safely Nanyong Sun
2024-01-15  2:38   ` Muchun Song
2024-02-07 12:21   ` Mark Rutland
2024-02-08  9:30     ` Nanyong Sun
2024-01-13  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: mm: Re-enable OPTIMIZE_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP Nanyong Sun
2024-01-25 18:06 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-01-27  5:04   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] A Solution to Re-enable hugetlb vmemmap optimize Nanyong Sun
2024-02-07 11:12     ` Will Deacon
2024-02-07 11:21       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-07 12:11         ` Will Deacon
2024-02-07 12:24           ` Mark Rutland
2024-02-07 14:17           ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-08  2:24             ` Jane Chu
2024-02-08 15:49               ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-08 19:21                 ` Jane Chu
2024-02-11 11:59                 ` Muchun Song
2024-06-05 20:50                   ` Yu Zhao
2024-06-06  8:30                     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-07 16:55                       ` Frank van der Linden
2024-02-07 12:20         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-02-08  9:44           ` Nanyong Sun
2024-02-08 13:17             ` Will Deacon
2024-03-13 23:32               ` David Rientjes
2024-03-25 15:24                 ` Nanyong Sun
2024-03-26 12:54                   ` Will Deacon
2024-06-24  5:39                   ` Yu Zhao
2024-06-27 14:33                     ` Nanyong Sun
2024-06-27 21:03                       ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-04 11:47                         ` Nanyong Sun
2024-07-04 19:45                           ` Yu Zhao
2024-02-07 12:44     ` Catalin Marinas
2024-06-27 21:19       ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-05 15:49         ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-05 17:41           ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-10 16:51             ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-10 17:12               ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-10 22:29                 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-10 23:07                   ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  8:31                     ` Yu Zhao
2024-07-11 11:39                       ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-11 17:38                         ` Yu Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbKjHHeEdFYY1xR5@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox