From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@linux.dev>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] fs/locks: Fix file lock cache accounting, again
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:49:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zaj0LYIJRL9TNj2R@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6667b799702e1815bd4e4f7744eddbc0bd042bb7.camel@kernel.org>
On Wed 17-01-24 14:00:55, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I'm really not a fan of tunables or different kconfig options,
> especially for something niche like this.
I completely agree with that. We do have plethora of kernel objects
which are accounted and we really do not want to have a kernel cmd line
option for many/each of them. Kernel memory accounting can be disabled
through kernel cmd line already.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 16:14 [PATCH RFC 0/4] " Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] fs/locks: " Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 19:00 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-17 19:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-17 21:02 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-17 22:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-01-17 22:56 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-22 5:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-22 17:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-26 9:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-30 11:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-19 7:47 ` Shakeel Butt
2024-01-17 21:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-17 21:50 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-01-18 9:49 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] fs/locks: Add CONFIG_FLOCK_ACCOUNTING Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-17 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] mitigations: Expand 'mitigations=off' to include optional software mitigations Josh Poimboeuf
[not found] ` <3e803d5aee5dd1f4c738f0de1e839e6cfcb9dc41.1705507931.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org>
2024-01-18 9:04 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] mitigations: Add flock cache accounting to 'mitigations=off' Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zaj0LYIJRL9TNj2R@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vasily.averin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox