From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 07:37:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaBRkCtkMoTdiN+3@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZaAPSJHGsmG_oHAU@pc638.lan>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 04:54:48PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 08:02:16PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:46:29PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > > Concurrent access to a global vmap space is a bottle-neck.
> > > We can simulate a high contention by running a vmalloc test
> > > suite.
> > >
> > > To address it, introduce an effective vmap node logic. Each
> > > node behaves as independent entity. When a node is accessed
> > > it serves a request directly(if possible) from its pool.
> > >
> > > This model has a size based pool for requests, i.e. pools are
> > > serialized and populated based on object size and real demand.
> > > A maximum object size that pool can handle is set to 256 pages.
> > >
> > > This technique reduces a pressure on the global vmap lock.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> >
> > Why not use a llist for this? That gets rid of the need for a
> > new pool_lock altogether...
> >
> Initially i used the llist. I have changed it because i keep track
> of objects per a pool to decay it later. I do not find these locks
> as contented one therefore i did not think much.
Ok. I've used llist and an atomic counter to track the list length
in the past.
But is the list length even necessary? It seems to me that it is
only used by the shrinker to determine how many objects are on the
lists for scanning, and I'm not sure that's entirely necessary given
the way the current global shrinker works (i.e. completely unfair to
low numbered nodes due to scan loop start bias).
> Anyway, i will have a look at this to see if llist is easy to go with
> or not. If so i will send out a separate patch.
Sounds good, it was just something that crossed my mind given the
pattern of "producer adds single items, consumer detaches entire
list, processes it and reattaches remainder" is a perfect match for
the llist structure.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 18:46 [PATCH v3 00/11] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v3 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm: vmalloc: Add va_alloc() helper Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] mm: vmalloc: Rename adjust_va_to_fit_type() function Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] mm: vmalloc: Move vmap_init_free_space() down in vmalloc.c Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-05 8:10 ` Wen Gu
2024-01-05 10:50 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-06 9:17 ` Wen Gu
2024-01-06 16:36 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-07 6:59 ` Hillf Danton
2024-01-08 7:45 ` Wen Gu
2024-01-08 18:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-16 23:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-01-18 13:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-20 12:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-01-22 17:44 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] mm/vmalloc: remove vmap_area_list Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-16 23:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] mm: vmalloc: Remove global purge_vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-03 11:08 ` Hillf Danton
2024-01-03 15:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-11 9:02 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-11 15:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-11 20:37 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2024-01-12 12:18 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-16 22:12 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-18 18:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-08 0:25 ` Baoquan He
2024-02-08 13:57 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-28 9:48 ` Baoquan He
2024-02-28 10:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-28 12:26 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-22 18:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-22 19:03 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-03-22 20:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vread_iter Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes based on CPUs in a system Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-01-11 9:25 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-15 19:09 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-16 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-18 18:23 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-18 21:28 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-19 10:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-01-02 18:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] mm: vmalloc: Add a shrinker to drain vmap pools Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2024-02-22 8:35 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v3 Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-22 23:15 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-02-23 9:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-23 10:26 ` Baoquan He
2024-02-23 11:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-23 15:57 ` Baoquan He
2024-02-23 18:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2024-02-28 9:27 ` Baoquan He
2024-02-29 10:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaBRkCtkMoTdiN+3@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox