From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: slub - extended kmalloc redzone and dma alignment
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 15:21:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_N84iPTYi3IZov4@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_KJgHRHsRMavQex@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local>
On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 10:02:40PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
[...]
> > I can remember this series, as well as my confusion why 192-byte
> > kmalloc caches were missing on arm64.
> >
> > Nevertheless, I believe ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is required to avoid putting
> > a DMA buffer on the same cache line as some other data that might be
> > _written_ by the CPU while the corresponding main memory is modified by
> > another bus-mastering device.
> >
> > Consider this layout:
> >
> > ... | DMA buffer | other data | ...
> > ^ ^
> > +-------------------------+-- cache line boundaries
> >
> > When you prepare for DMA, you make sure that the DMA buffer is not
> > cached by the CPU, so you flush the cache line (from all levels). Then
> > you tell the device to write into the DMA buffer. However, before the
> > device finishes the DMA transaction, the CPU accesses "other data",
> > loading this cache line from main memory with partial results. Worse,
> > if the CPU writes to "other data", it may write the cache line back
> > into main memory, racing with the device writing to DMA buffer, and you
> > end up with corrupted data in DMA buffer.
> >
> > But redzone poisoning should happen long before the DMA buffer cache
> > line is flushed. The device will not overwrite it unless it was given
> > wrong buffer length for the transaction, but then that would be a bug
> > that I'd rather detect.
>
> I alaso tend to think it's better for slub to detect these kind of DMA
> 'overflow'. We've added slub kunit test case for these in commmit
> 6cd6d33ca41f ("mm/slub, kunit: Add a test case for kmalloc redzone check),
> which was inspired by a similar DMA related bug as described in
> commit 120ee599b5bf ("staging: octeon-usb: prevent memory corruption")
I'm not familiar with DMA stuff, but Vlastimil's idea does make it
easier for driver developer to write a driver to be used on different
ARCHs, which have different DMA alignment requirement. Say if the minimal
safe size is 8 bytes, the driver can just request 8 bytes and
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN will automatically chose the right size for it, which
can save memory for ARCHs with smaller alignment requirement. Meanwhile
it does sacrifice part of the redzone check ability, so I don't have
preference here :)
Thanks,
Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 9:30 Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-04 10:30 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-04 11:12 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-04 12:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-04 13:53 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-06 14:02 ` Feng Tang
2025-04-07 7:21 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2025-04-07 7:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-07 9:50 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-07 17:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-08 5:27 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-08 15:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-09 8:39 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-09 9:05 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-09 9:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-09 12:18 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-09 12:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-09 13:41 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-09 8:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-09 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-09 12:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-09 14:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-10 1:54 ` Feng Tang
2025-04-07 7:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_N84iPTYi3IZov4@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local \
--to=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox