From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/khugepaged: Remove redundant try_to_freeze()
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:38:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYLgMycwLvlGLhzn@pek-khao-d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231219160033.35263ae2818c3e8bd73ae086@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1825 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 04:00:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 07:17:53 +0800 Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A freezable kernel thread can enter frozen state during freezing by
> > either calling try_to_freeze() or using wait_event_freezable() and its
> > variants. However, there is no need to use both methods simultaneously.
> > The freezable wait variants have been used in khugepaged_wait_work()
> > and khugepaged_alloc_sleep(), so remove this redundant
> > try_to_freeze().
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -2500,7 +2500,7 @@ static void khugepaged_do_scan(struct collapse_control *cc)
> > while (true) {
> > cond_resched();
> >
> > - if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop() || try_to_freeze()))
> > + if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop()))
> > break;
> >
> > spin_lock(&khugepaged_mm_lock);
>
> What are the effects upon worst-case freezing latency?
I used the following stress-ng command to generate some memory load on my Intel
Alder Lake board (24 CPUs, 32G memory).
stress-ng --vm 48 --vm-bytes 90%
The worst freezing latency is:
Freezing user space processes
Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.040 seconds)
OOM killer disabled.
Freezing remaining freezable tasks
Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
Without the faked memory load, the freezing latency is:
Freezing user space processes
Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.000 seconds)
OOM killer disabled.
Freezing remaining freezable tasks
Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
I didn't see any observable difference whether this patch is applied or not.
Thanks,
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 23:17 Kevin Hao
2023-12-20 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-20 12:38 ` Kevin Hao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYLgMycwLvlGLhzn@pek-khao-d3 \
--to=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox