linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,  akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de,  linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	 shiju.jose@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	 yishaih@nvidia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	 kevin.tian@intel.com, aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com,
	 kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
	 acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, anuaggarwal@nvidia.com,
	 jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: Add poison error check in fixup_user_fault() for mapped pfn
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:04:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWoSM_0xLJQo8De5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123003513.24292-3-ankita@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> 
> The fixup_user_fault() currently does not expect a VM_FAULT_HWPOISON
> and hence does not check for it while calling vm_fault_to_errno(). Since
> we now have a new code path which can trigger such case, change
> fixup_user_fault to look for VM_FAULT_HWPOISON.
> 
> Also make hva_to_pfn_remapped check for -EHWPOISON and communicate the
> poison fault up to the user_mem_abort().

I would much prefer the KVM change be split out to its own patch, I see no
reason why it needs to be bundled with the fixup_user_fault() change.  KVM will
set pfn to KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT before and after the fixup_user_fault() change.

> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  mm/gup.c            | 2 +-
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 231711efa390..b78af20a0f52 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ int fixup_user_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR) {
> -		int err = vm_fault_to_errno(ret, 0);
> +		int err = vm_fault_to_errno(ret, FOLL_HWPOISON);
>  
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 486800a7024b..2ff067f21a7c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2731,6 +2731,12 @@ kvm_pfn_t hva_to_pfn(unsigned long addr, bool atomic, bool interruptible,
>  		r = hva_to_pfn_remapped(vma, addr, write_fault, writable, &pfn);
>  		if (r == -EAGAIN)
>  			goto retry;
> +
> +		if (r == -EHWPOISON) {
> +			pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON;
> +			goto exit;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (r < 0)
>  			pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;

I vote for

		if (r == -EHWPOISON)
			pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON;
		else if (r < 0)
			pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;

or even opportunstically fix the < 0 weirdness:

		if (r == -EHWPOISON)
			pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON;
		else if (r)
			pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;

It's rather confusing to see a goto in one error path but an effective fallthrough
in a different error path, i.e. gives the impression that KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON
has some special behavior that doesn't apply to KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-01 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-23  0:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: Implement ECC handling for pfn with no struct page ankita
2023-11-23  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: handle poisoning of pfn without struct pages ankita
2023-11-23  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: Add poison error check in fixup_user_fault() for mapped pfn ankita
2023-12-01 17:04   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-11-23  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: Change ghes code to allow poison of non-struct pfn ankita
2023-12-02 23:23   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 14:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-04 15:36       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 15:54         ` Ankit Agrawal
2023-12-04 15:55           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-23  0:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio/nvgpu: register device memory for poison handling ankita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWoSM_0xLJQo8De5@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=anuaggarwal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=danw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox