From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
shiju.jose@huawei.com, bhelgaas@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
yishaih@nvidia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, anuaggarwal@nvidia.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: Add poison error check in fixup_user_fault() for mapped pfn
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:04:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWoSM_0xLJQo8De5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123003513.24292-3-ankita@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
>
> The fixup_user_fault() currently does not expect a VM_FAULT_HWPOISON
> and hence does not check for it while calling vm_fault_to_errno(). Since
> we now have a new code path which can trigger such case, change
> fixup_user_fault to look for VM_FAULT_HWPOISON.
>
> Also make hva_to_pfn_remapped check for -EHWPOISON and communicate the
> poison fault up to the user_mem_abort().
I would much prefer the KVM change be split out to its own patch, I see no
reason why it needs to be bundled with the fixup_user_fault() change. KVM will
set pfn to KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT before and after the fixup_user_fault() change.
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 231711efa390..b78af20a0f52 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ int fixup_user_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
>
> if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR) {
> - int err = vm_fault_to_errno(ret, 0);
> + int err = vm_fault_to_errno(ret, FOLL_HWPOISON);
>
> if (err)
> return err;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 486800a7024b..2ff067f21a7c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2731,6 +2731,12 @@ kvm_pfn_t hva_to_pfn(unsigned long addr, bool atomic, bool interruptible,
> r = hva_to_pfn_remapped(vma, addr, write_fault, writable, &pfn);
> if (r == -EAGAIN)
> goto retry;
> +
> + if (r == -EHWPOISON) {
> + pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> if (r < 0)
> pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
I vote for
if (r == -EHWPOISON)
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON;
else if (r < 0)
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
or even opportunstically fix the < 0 weirdness:
if (r == -EHWPOISON)
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON;
else if (r)
pfn = KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT;
It's rather confusing to see a goto in one error path but an effective fallthrough
in a different error path, i.e. gives the impression that KVM_PFN_ERR_HWPOISON
has some special behavior that doesn't apply to KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-01 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 0:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: Implement ECC handling for pfn with no struct page ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: handle poisoning of pfn without struct pages ankita
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: Add poison error check in fixup_user_fault() for mapped pfn ankita
2023-12-01 17:04 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: Change ghes code to allow poison of non-struct pfn ankita
2023-12-02 23:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-04 15:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-12-04 15:54 ` Ankit Agrawal
2023-12-04 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-23 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio/nvgpu: register device memory for poison handling ankita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWoSM_0xLJQo8De5@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=anuaggarwal@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox