From: Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/thp: add CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER option
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:05:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW9YcT6jH3JjdJSy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231204121524.dfa9f98e809c91b353968d34@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:15:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 20:57:33 +0100 Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:13:01AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:32:54 +0100 Dmytro Maluka <dmaluka@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add an option to disable transparent hugepages by default, in line with
> > > > the existing transparent_hugepage=never command line setting.
> > > >
> > > > Rationale: khugepaged has its own non-negligible memory cost even if it
> > > > is not used by any applications, since it bumps up vm.min_free_kbytes to
> > > > its own required minimum in set_recommended_min_free_kbytes(). For
> > > > example, on a machine with 4GB RAM, with 3 mm zones and pageblock_order
> > > > == MAX_ORDER, starting khugepaged causes vm.min_free_kbytes increase
> > > > from 8MB to 132MB.
> > > >
> > > > So if we use THP on machines with e.g. >=8GB of memory for better
> > > > performance, but avoid using it on lower-memory machines to avoid its
> > > > memory overhead, then for the same reason we also want to avoid even
> > > > starting khugepaged on those <8GB machines. So with
> > > > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER we can use the same kernel image on
> > > > both >=8GB and <8GB machines, with THP support enabled but khugepaged
> > > > not started by default. The userspace can then decide to enable THP
> > > > (i.e. start khugepaged) via sysfs if needed, based on the total amount
> > > > of memory.
> > > >
> > > > This could also be achieved with the existing transparent_hugepage=never
> > > > setting in the kernel command line instead. But it seems cleaner to
> > > > avoid tweaking the command line for such a basic setting.
> > > >
> > > > P.S. I see that CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER was already proposed
> > > > in the past [1] but without an explanation of the purpose.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > --- a/mm/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -859,6 +859,12 @@ choice
> > > > madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) but it won't risk to increase the
> > > > memory footprint of applications without a guaranteed
> > > > benefit.
> > > > +
> > > > + config TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER
> > > > + bool "never"
> > > > + help
> > > > + Disabling Transparent Hugepage by default. It can still be
> > >
> > > s/Disabling/Disable/
> >
> > It is in line with the descriptions of TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_ALWAYS and
> > TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_MADVISE: "Enabling Transparent Hugepage ..."
>
> Those are incorrect also.
Ok, corrected in v2. Also clarified the changelog wrt your 2nd question.
> > > > + enabled at runtime via sysfs.
> > > > endchoice
> > >
> > > The patch adds the config option but doesn't use it?
> >
> > I should have been more precise: it is not a new option but a new choice
> > for CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, in addition to the existing ALWAYS and
> > MADVISE choices. In mm/huge_memory.c in the declaration of the
> > transparent_hugepage_flags variable, if either ALWAYS or MADVISE is
> > chosen, transparent_hugepage_flags is initialized with such a value
> > that makes khugepaged being started by default during bootup. This patch
> > allows enabling CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE without setting either
> > ALWAYS or MADVISE, so that transparent_hugepage_flags is initialized
> > with such a value that khugepaged is not started by default.
>
> OK, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 16:32 Dmytro Maluka
2023-12-04 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-04 19:57 ` Dmytro Maluka
2023-12-04 20:15 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-05 17:05 ` Dmytro Maluka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZW9YcT6jH3JjdJSy@google.com \
--to=dmaluka@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox