linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: John Groves <john@jagalactic.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ying.huang@intel.com" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"mhocko@kernel.org" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"lizefan.x@bytedance.com" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
	"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"roman.gushchin@linux.dev" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"shakeelb@google.com" <shakeelb@google.com>,
	"muchun.song@linux.dev" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
	"jgroves@micron.com" <jgroves@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] memcg weighted interleave mempolicy control
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:05:59 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZU6pR46kiuzPricM@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0100018bb64636ef-9daaf0c0-813c-4209-94e4-96ba6854f554-000000@email.amazonses.com>

Hello,

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:48:56PM +0000, John Groves wrote:
> This approach checks all the important boxes: it only applies to apps where
> it's enabled, the weighting can vary from one app to another, the
> kernel is not affected, and the numa topology is not buried.

Can't it be a mempol property which is inherited by child processes? Then
all you'll need is e.g. adding systemd support to configure this at service
unit level. I'm having a bit of hard time seeing why this needs to be a
cgroup feature when it doesn't involve dynamic resource accounting /
enforcement at all.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-10 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09  0:25 Gregory Price
2023-11-09  0:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] mm/memcontrol: implement memcg.interleave_weights Gregory Price
2023-11-09  0:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] mm/mempolicy: implement weighted interleave Gregory Price
2023-11-10 15:26   ` Ravi Jonnalagadda
2023-11-09  0:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] Documentation: sysfs entries for cgroup.memory.interleave_weights Gregory Price
2023-11-09 10:02 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] memcg weighted interleave mempolicy control Michal Hocko
2023-11-09 15:10   ` Gregory Price
2023-11-09 16:34   ` Gregory Price
2023-11-10  9:05     ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-10 21:24       ` Gregory Price
     [not found] ` <klhcqksrg7uvdrf6hoi5tegifycjltz2kx2d62hapmw3ulr7oa@woibsnrpgox4>
2023-11-09 22:48   ` John Groves
2023-11-10 22:05     ` tj [this message]
2023-11-10 22:29       ` Gregory Price
2023-11-11  3:05         ` tj
2023-11-11  3:42           ` Gregory Price
2023-11-11 11:16             ` tj
2023-11-11 23:54               ` Dan Williams
2023-11-13  2:22                 ` Gregory Price
2023-11-14  9:43             ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-14 15:50               ` Gregory Price
2023-11-14 17:01                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-14 17:49                   ` Gregory Price
2023-11-15  5:56                     ` Huang, Ying
2023-12-04  3:33                       ` Gregory Price
2023-12-04  8:19                         ` Huang, Ying
2023-12-04 13:50                           ` Gregory Price
2023-12-05  9:01                             ` Huang, Ying
2023-12-05 14:47                               ` Gregory Price
2023-12-06  0:50                                 ` Huang, Ying
2023-12-06  2:01                                   ` Gregory Price
2023-11-10  6:16 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-10 19:54   ` Gregory Price
2023-11-13  1:31     ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-13  2:28       ` Gregory Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZU6pR46kiuzPricM@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jgroves@micron.com \
    --cc=john@jagalactic.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox