From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, lstoakes@gmail.com, hughd@google.com,
david@redhat.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
peterz@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
riel@redhat.com, ying.huang@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:21:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZU1plX2mDgKbkAJ0@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com>
I went spelunking to try to find out more about this issue, and I
discovered it's Aneesh's fault from 2017 ...
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:47:24PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> There is a performance issue that has been bothering us recently.
> This problem can reproduce in the latest mainline version (Linux 6.6).
>
> We use mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) in the user mode process
> to avoid performance problems caused by major fault.
>
> There is a stage in numa fault which will set pte as 0 in do_numa_page() :
> ptep_modify_prot_start() will clear the vmf->pte, until
> ptep_modify_prot_commit() assign a value to the vmf->pte.
>
> For the data segment of the user-mode program, the global variable area
> is a private mapping. After the pagecache is loaded, the private
> anonymous page is generated after the COW is triggered. Mlockall can
> lock COW pages (anonymous pages), but the original file pages cannot
> be locked and may be reclaimed. If the global variable (private anon page)
> is accessed when vmf->pte is zero which is concurrently set by numa fault,
> a file page fault will be triggered.
>
> At this time, the original private file page may have been reclaimed.
> If the page cache is not available at this time, a major fault will be
> triggered and the file will be read, causing additional overhead.
>
> Our problem scenario is as follows:
>
> task 1 task 2
> ------ ------
> /* scan global variables */
> do_numa_page()
> spin_lock(vmf->ptl)
> ptep_modify_prot_start()
> /* set vmf->pte as null */
> /* Access global variables */
> handle_pte_fault()
> /* no pte lock */
> do_pte_missing()
> do_fault()
> do_read_fault()
> ptep_modify_prot_commit()
> /* ptep update done */
> pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl)
> do_fault_around()
> __do_fault()
> filemap_fault()
> /* page cache is not available
> and a major fault is triggered */
> do_sync_mmap_readahead()
> /* page_not_uptodate and goto
> out_retry. */
>
> Is there any way to avoid such a major fault?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Peng
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-09 13:47 zhangpeng (AS)
2023-11-09 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-09 14:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-09 15:15 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-09 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-10 5:32 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-10 9:04 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-13 2:02 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-14 11:23 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-15 1:46 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-10 9:39 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2023-11-09 22:54 ` Yang Shi
2023-11-10 1:57 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-10 3:39 ` Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10 3:50 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-10 4:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-11-14 1:41 ` Yang Shi
2023-11-14 11:10 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-09 23:21 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-11-10 5:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-10 8:36 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2023-11-10 8:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-10 9:50 ` zhangpeng (AS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZU1plX2mDgKbkAJ0@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox