linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, lstoakes@gmail.com, hughd@google.com,
	david@redhat.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	peterz@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	riel@redhat.com, ying.huang@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Question]: major faults are still triggered after mlockall when numa balancing
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 23:21:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZU1plX2mDgKbkAJ0@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com>


I went spelunking to try to find out more about this issue, and I
discovered it's Aneesh's fault from 2017 ...

On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 09:47:24PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> There is a performance issue that has been bothering us recently.
> This problem can reproduce in the latest mainline version (Linux 6.6).
> 
> We use mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) in the user mode process
> to avoid performance problems caused by major fault.
> 
> There is a stage in numa fault which will set pte as 0 in do_numa_page() :
> ptep_modify_prot_start() will clear the vmf->pte, until
> ptep_modify_prot_commit() assign a value to the vmf->pte.
> 
> For the data segment of the user-mode program, the global variable area
> is a private mapping. After the pagecache is loaded, the private
> anonymous page is generated after the COW is triggered. Mlockall can
> lock COW pages (anonymous pages), but the original file pages cannot
> be locked and may be reclaimed. If the global variable (private anon page)
> is accessed when vmf->pte is zero which is concurrently set by numa fault,
> a file page fault will be triggered.
> 
> At this time, the original private file page may have been reclaimed.
> If the page cache is not available at this time, a major fault will be
> triggered and the file will be read, causing additional overhead.
> 
> Our problem scenario is as follows:
> 
> task 1                      task 2
> ------                      ------
> /* scan global variables */
> do_numa_page()
>   spin_lock(vmf->ptl)
>   ptep_modify_prot_start()
>   /* set vmf->pte as null */
>                             /* Access global variables */
>                             handle_pte_fault()
>                               /* no pte lock */
>                               do_pte_missing()
>                                 do_fault()
>                                   do_read_fault()
>   ptep_modify_prot_commit()
>   /* ptep update done */
>   pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl)
>                                     do_fault_around()
>                                     __do_fault()
>                                       filemap_fault()
>                                         /* page cache is not available
>                                         and a major fault is triggered */
>                                         do_sync_mmap_readahead()
>                                         /* page_not_uptodate and goto
>                                         out_retry. */
> 
> Is there any way to avoid such a major fault?
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Peng
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-09 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09 13:47 zhangpeng (AS)
2023-11-09 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-09 14:29   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-09 15:15     ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-09 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-10  5:32   ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-10  9:04     ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-13  2:02       ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-14 11:23         ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-15  1:46           ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-10  9:39   ` zhangpeng (AS)
2023-11-09 22:54 ` Yang Shi
2023-11-10  1:57   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-10  3:39     ` Kefeng Wang
2023-11-10  3:50       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-10  4:00         ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2023-11-14  1:41     ` Yang Shi
2023-11-14 11:10       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-11-09 23:21 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-11-10  5:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-10  8:36   ` zhangpeng (AS)
2023-11-10  8:17 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2023-11-10  9:50   ` zhangpeng (AS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZU1plX2mDgKbkAJ0@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox