linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>,
	Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes: fix
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:45:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTf0mP3fTvhlr/DX@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b570bcd-e0fb-4473-7cfc-81b8b53d7712@google.com>

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 09:32:44AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> 
> > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> [231024 02:50]:
> > > mm-unstable commit edd33b8807a1 ("mempolicy: migration attempt to match
> > > interleave nodes") added a second vma_iter search to do_mbind(), to
> > > determine the interleave index to be used in the MPOL_INTERLEAVE case.
> > > 
> > > But sadly it added it just after the mmap_write_unlock(), leaving this
> > > new VMA search unprotected: and so syzbot reports suspicious RCU usage
> > > from lib/maple_tree.c:856.
> > > 
> > > This could be fixed with an rcu_read_lock/unlock() pair (per Liam);
> > > but since we have been relying on the mmap_lock up to this point, it's
> > > slightly better to extend it over the new search too, for a well-defined
> > > result consistent with the policy this mbind() is establishing (rather
> > > than whatever might follow once the mmap_lock is dropped).
> > 
> > Would downgrading the lock work?  It would avoid the potential writing
> > issue and should still satisfy lockdep.
> 
> Downgrading the lock would work, but it would be a pointless complication.

I tend to agree.  It's also becoming far less important these days
with the vast majority of page faults handled under the per-VMA lock.
We might be able to turn it into a mutex instead of an rwsem without
seeing a noticable drop-off in performance.  Not volunteering to try this.


      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-03  9:12 [PATCH v2 00/12] mempolicy: cleanups leading to NUMA mpol without vma Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] hugetlbfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy pretence Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] kernfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy hooks Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mempolicy: fix migrate_pages(2) syscall return nr_failed Hugh Dickins
2023-10-07  7:27   ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-03  9:19 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] mempolicy trivia: delete those ancient pr_debug()s Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] mempolicy trivia: slightly more consistent naming Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] mempolicy trivia: use pgoff_t in shared mempolicy tree Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] mempolicy: mpol_shared_policy_init() without pseudo-vma Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] mempolicy: remove confusing MPOL_MF_LAZY dead code Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03 22:28   ` Yang Shi
2023-10-03  9:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: add page_rmappable_folio() wrapper Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] mempolicy: alloc_pages_mpol() for NUMA policy without vma Hugh Dickins
2023-10-19 20:39   ` [PATCH v3 " Hugh Dickins
2023-10-23 16:53     ` domenico cerasuolo
2023-10-23 17:53       ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-23 18:10         ` domenico cerasuolo
2023-10-23 19:05           ` Johannes Weiner
2023-10-23 19:48             ` Hugh Dickins
2023-10-24  6:44             ` [PATCH] mempolicy: alloc_pages_mpol() for NUMA policy without vma: fix Hugh Dickins
2023-10-24  8:17               ` kernel test robot
2023-10-24 15:56                 ` Hugh Dickins
2023-10-24 16:09               ` [PATCH v2] " Hugh Dickins
2023-10-23 18:34     ` [PATCH v3 10/12] mempolicy: alloc_pages_mpol() for NUMA policy without vma Zi Yan
2023-10-23 21:10       ` Hugh Dickins
2023-10-23 21:13         ` Zi Yan
2023-10-03  9:27 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] mempolicy: mmap_lock is not needed while migrating folios Hugh Dickins
2023-10-03  9:29 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes Hugh Dickins
2023-10-24  6:50   ` [PATCH] mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes: fix Hugh Dickins
2023-10-24 15:18     ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-10-24 16:32       ` Hugh Dickins
2023-10-24 16:45         ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTf0mP3fTvhlr/DX@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox