From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 01:20:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZS8WsKeeoBOLGy-B@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017230110.3170850-4-axelrasmussen@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4852 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> This is a new feature recently added to the kernel. So, document the new
> ioctl the same way we do other UFFDIO_* ioctls.
>
> Also note the corresponding new ioctl flag we can return in response to
> a UFFDIO_REGISTER call.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Thanks for the patch and the review. Patch applied.
Cheers,
Alex
> ---
> man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> index 40528001e..a9131515c 100644
> --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> @@ -405,6 +405,11 @@ operation is supported.
> The
> .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
> operation is supported.
> +.TP
> +.B 1 << _UFFDIO_POISON
> +The
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation is supported.
> .PP
> This
> .BR ioctl (2)
> @@ -886,6 +891,12 @@ does not equal the value that was specified in the
> .I range.len
> field.
> .TP
> +.B EEXIST
> +One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +No existing page could be found in the page cache for the given range.
> +.TP
> .B EINVAL
> Either
> .I range.start
> @@ -900,9 +911,6 @@ An invalid bit was specified in the
> .I mode
> field.
> .TP
> -.B EEXIST
> -One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> -.TP
> .B ENOENT
> The faulting process has changed its virtual memory layout simultaneously with
> an outstanding
> @@ -912,14 +920,118 @@ operation.
> .B ENOMEM
> Allocating memory needed to setup the page table mappings failed.
> .TP
> -.B EFAULT
> -No existing page could be found in the page cache for the given range.
> -.TP
> .B ESRCH
> The faulting process has exited at the time of a
> .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
> operation.
> .\"
> +.SS UFFDIO_POISON
> +(Since Linux 6.6.)
> +Mark an address range as "poisoned".
> +Future accesses to these addresses will raise a
> +.B SIGBUS
> +signal.
> +Unlike
> +.B MADV_HWPOISON
> +this works by installing page table entries,
> +rather than "really" poisoning the underlying physical pages.
> +This means it only affects this particular address space.
> +.PP
> +The
> +.I argp
> +argument is a pointer to a
> +.I uffdio_poison
> +structure as shown below:
> +.PP
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +struct uffdio_poison {
> + struct uffdio_range range;
> + /* Range to install poison PTE markers in */
> + __u64 mode; /* Flags controlling the behavior of poison */
> + __s64 updated; /* Number of bytes poisoned, or negated error */
> +};
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.PP
> +The following value may be bitwise ORed in
> +.I mode
> +to change the behavior of the
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation:
> +.TP
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON_MODE_DONTWAKE
> +Do not wake up the thread that waits for page-fault resolution.
> +.PP
> +The
> +.I updated
> +field is used by the kernel
> +to return the number of bytes that were actually poisoned,
> +or an error in the same manner as
> +.BR UFFDIO_COPY .
> +If the value returned in the
> +.I updated
> +field doesn't match the value that was specified in
> +.IR range.len ,
> +the operation fails with the error
> +.BR EAGAIN .
> +The
> +.I updated
> +field is output-only;
> +it is not read by the
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation.
> +.PP
> +This
> +.BR ioctl (2)
> +operation returns 0 on success.
> +In this case,
> +the entire area was poisoned.
> +On error, \-1 is returned and
> +.I errno
> +is set to indicate the error.
> +Possible errors include:
> +.TP
> +.B EAGAIN
> +The number of bytes mapped
> +(i.e., the value returned in the
> +.I updated
> +field)
> +does not equal the value that was specified in the
> +.I range.len
> +field.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +Either
> +.I range.start
> +or
> +.I range.len
> +was not a multiple of the system page size; or
> +.I range.len
> +was zero; or the range specified was invalid.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +An invalid bit was specified in the
> +.I mode
> +field.
> +.TP
> +.B EEXIST
> +One or more pages were already mapped in the given range.
> +.TP
> +.B ENOENT
> +The faulting process has changed its virtual memory layout simultaneously with
> +an outstanding
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation.
> +.TP
> +.B ENOMEM
> +Allocating memory for page table entries failed.
> +.TP
> +.B ESRCH
> +The faulting process has exited at the time of a
> +.B UFFDIO_POISON
> +operation.
> +.\"
> .SH RETURN VALUE
> See descriptions of the individual operations, above.
> .SH ERRORS
> --
> 2.42.0.655.g421f12c284-goog
>
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-17 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 23:01 [PATCH v3 0/3] userfaultfd man page updates Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-17 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: clarify the state of the uffdio_api structure on error Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-17 23:07 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-17 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix / update UFFDIO_REGISTER error code list Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-17 23:23 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-17 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-17 23:20 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZS8WsKeeoBOLGy-B@debian \
--to=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox