linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] mm: improve performance of accounted kernel memory allocations
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 12:02:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR22wUtVq_vz3NJZ@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <n3x64d2wk7qr42tvcmqisbbrntppcwe6omv6li67ui6rz6umyk@wativjrwvh5g>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 08:32:39PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:00:50AM -0700, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
> > This patchset improves the performance of accounted kernel memory allocations
> > by ~30% as measured by a micro-benchmark [1]. The benchmark is very
> > straightforward: 1M of 64 bytes-large kmalloc() allocations.
> 
> Nice.

Thanks!

> Have you tried how these +34% compose with -34% reported way back [1]
> when file lock accounting was added (because your benchmark and lock1
> sound quite similar)?

No, I haven't. I'm kindly waiting for an automatic report here :)
But if someone can run these tests manually, I'll appreciate it a lot.

> (BTW Is that your motivation (too)?)

Not really, it was on my todo list for a long time and I just got some spare
cycles to figure out missing parts (mostly around targeted/remote charging).

Also plan to try similar approach to speed up generic memcg charging.

Thanks!


      reply	other threads:[~2023-10-04 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29 18:00 Roman Gushchin
2023-09-29 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] mm: kmem: optimize get_obj_cgroup_from_current() Roman Gushchin
2023-10-03 16:48   ` Johannes Weiner
2023-09-29 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] mm: kmem: add direct objcg pointer to task_struct Roman Gushchin
2023-10-03 16:59   ` Johannes Weiner
2023-09-29 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] mm: kmem: make memcg keep a reference to the original objcg Roman Gushchin
2023-09-29 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] mm: kmem: scoped objcg protection Roman Gushchin
2023-09-29 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] percpu: " Roman Gushchin
2023-10-04 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] mm: improve performance of accounted kernel memory allocations Michal Koutný
2023-10-04 19:02   ` Roman Gushchin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZR22wUtVq_vz3NJZ@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox