linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:04:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPgWXgL1nLASjx8O@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230829081142.3619-7-urezki@gmail.com>

On 08/29/23 at 10:11am, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Concurrent access to a global vmap space is a bottle-neck.
> We can simulate a high contention by running a vmalloc test
> suite.
> 
> To address it, introduce an effective vmap node logic. Each
> node behaves as independent entity. When a node is accessed
> it serves a request directly(if possible) also it can fetch
> a new block from a global heap to its internals if no space
> or low capacity is left.
> 
> This technique reduces a pressure on the global vmap lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 279 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 5a8a9c1370b6..4fd4915c532d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -779,6 +779,7 @@ struct rb_list {
>  
>  struct vmap_node {
>  	/* Bookkeeping data of this node. */
> +	struct rb_list free;
>  	struct rb_list busy;
>  	struct rb_list lazy;
>  
> @@ -786,6 +787,13 @@ struct vmap_node {
>  	 * Ready-to-free areas.
>  	 */
>  	struct list_head purge_list;
> +	struct work_struct purge_work;
> +	unsigned long nr_purged;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Control that only one user can pre-fetch this node.
> +	 */
> +	atomic_t fill_in_progress;
>  };
>  
>  static struct vmap_node *nodes, snode;
> @@ -804,6 +812,32 @@ addr_to_node(unsigned long addr)
>  	return &nodes[addr_to_node_id(addr)];
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct vmap_node *
> +id_to_node(int id)
> +{
> +	return &nodes[id % nr_nodes];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +this_node_id(void)
> +{
> +	return raw_smp_processor_id() % nr_nodes;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long
> +encode_vn_id(int node_id)
> +{
> +	/* Can store U8_MAX [0:254] nodes. */
> +	return (node_id + 1) << BITS_PER_BYTE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +decode_vn_id(unsigned long val)
> +{
> +	/* Can store U8_MAX [0:254] nodes. */
> +	return (val >> BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1;
> +}
> +
>  static __always_inline unsigned long
>  va_size(struct vmap_area *va)
>  {
> @@ -1586,6 +1620,7 @@ __alloc_vmap_area(struct rb_root *root, struct list_head *head,
>  static void free_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
>  {
>  	struct vmap_node *vn = addr_to_node(va->va_start);
> +	int vn_id = decode_vn_id(va->flags);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Remove from the busy tree/list.
> @@ -1594,12 +1629,19 @@ static void free_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
>  	unlink_va(va, &vn->busy.root);
>  	spin_unlock(&vn->busy.lock);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Insert/Merge it back to the free tree/list.
> -	 */
> -	spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> -	merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> -	spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +	if (vn_id >= 0) {

In alloc_vmap_area(), the vn_id is encoded into va->flags. When
allocation failed, the vn_id = 0. Here should we change to check 'if
(vn_id > 0)' becasue the vn_id == 0 means no available vn_id encoded
into. And I do not get how we treat the case vn_id truly is 0.

	va->flags = (addr != vend) ? encode_vn_id(vn_id) : 0;

> +		vn = id_to_node(vn_id);
> +
> +		/* Belongs to this node. */
> +		spin_lock(&vn->free.lock);
> +		merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &vn->free.root, &vn->free.head);
> +		spin_unlock(&vn->free.lock);
> +	} else {
> +		/* Goes to global. */
> +		spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +		merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> +		spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
......
> @@ -1640,7 +1810,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
>  	unsigned long freed;
>  	unsigned long addr;
>  	int purged = 0;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, vn_id;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!size || offset_in_page(size) || !is_power_of_2(align)))
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -1661,11 +1831,17 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
>  	 */
>  	kmemleak_scan_area(&va->rb_node, SIZE_MAX, gfp_mask);
>  
> +	vn_id = this_node_id();
> +	addr = node_alloc(vn_id, size, align, vstart, vend, gfp_mask, node);
> +	va->flags = (addr != vend) ? encode_vn_id(vn_id) : 0;
> +
>  retry:
> -	preload_this_cpu_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock, gfp_mask, node);
> -	addr = __alloc_vmap_area(&free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list,
> -		size, align, vstart, vend);
> -	spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +	if (addr == vend) {
> +		preload_this_cpu_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock, gfp_mask, node);
> +		addr = __alloc_vmap_area(&free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list,
> +			size, align, vstart, vend);
> +		spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +	}
>  
>  	trace_alloc_vmap_area(addr, size, align, vstart, vend, addr == vend);
>  
> @@ -1679,7 +1855,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
>  	va->va_start = addr;
>  	va->va_end = addr + size;
>  	va->vm = NULL;
> -	va->flags = va_flags;
> +	va->flags |= va_flags;
>  
>  	vn = addr_to_node(va->va_start);
>  
> @@ -1772,31 +1948,58 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(vmap_purge_lock);
>  static void purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus(void);
>  static cpumask_t purge_nodes;
>  
> -/*
> - * Purges all lazily-freed vmap areas.
> - */
> -static unsigned long
> -purge_vmap_node(struct vmap_node *vn)
> +static void
> +reclaim_list_global(struct list_head *head)
> +{
> +	struct vmap_area *va, *n;
> +
> +	if (list_empty(head))
> +		return;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(va, n, head, list)
> +		merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va,
> +			&free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void purge_vmap_node(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -	unsigned long num_purged_areas = 0;
> +	struct vmap_node *vn = container_of(work,
> +		struct vmap_node, purge_work);
>  	struct vmap_area *va, *n_va;
> +	LIST_HEAD(global);
> +
> +	vn->nr_purged = 0;
>  
>  	if (list_empty(&vn->purge_list))
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&vn->free.lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, &vn->purge_list, list) {
>  		unsigned long nr = (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		unsigned long orig_start = va->va_start;
>  		unsigned long orig_end = va->va_end;
> +		int vn_id = decode_vn_id(va->flags);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Finally insert or merge lazily-freed area. It is
> -		 * detached and there is no need to "unlink" it from
> -		 * anything.
> -		 */
> -		va = merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &free_vmap_area_root,
> -				&free_vmap_area_list);
> +		list_del_init(&va->list);
> +
> +		if (vn_id >= 0) {
> +			if (va_size(va) != node_size - (2 * PAGE_SIZE))
> +				va = merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &vn->free.root, &vn->free.head);
> +
> +			if (va_size(va) == node_size - (2 * PAGE_SIZE)) {
> +				if (!list_empty(&va->list))
> +					unlink_va_augment(va, &vn->free.root);
> +
> +				/* Restore the block size. */
> +				va->va_start -= PAGE_SIZE;
> +				va->va_end += PAGE_SIZE;
> +				list_add(&va->list, &global);
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			list_add(&va->list, &global);
> +		}
>  
>  		if (!va)
>  			continue;
> @@ -1806,11 +2009,10 @@ purge_vmap_node(struct vmap_node *vn)
>  					      va->va_start, va->va_end);
>  
>  		atomic_long_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
> -		num_purged_areas++;
> +		vn->nr_purged++;
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> -
> -	return num_purged_areas;
> +	spin_unlock(&vn->free.lock);
> +	reclaim_list_global(&global);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1818,11 +2020,17 @@ purge_vmap_node(struct vmap_node *vn)
>   */
>  static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  {
> -	unsigned long num_purged_areas = 0;
> +	unsigned long nr_purged_areas = 0;
> +	unsigned int nr_purge_helpers;
> +	unsigned int nr_purge_nodes;
>  	struct vmap_node *vn;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vmap_purge_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use cpumask to mark which node has to be processed.
> +	 */
>  	purge_nodes = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
> @@ -1847,17 +2055,45 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  		cpumask_set_cpu(i, &purge_nodes);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (cpumask_weight(&purge_nodes) > 0) {
> +	nr_purge_nodes = cpumask_weight(&purge_nodes);
> +	if (nr_purge_nodes > 0) {
>  		flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>  
> +		/* One extra worker is per a lazy_max_pages() full set minus one. */
> +		nr_purge_helpers = atomic_long_read(&vmap_lazy_nr) / lazy_max_pages();
> +		nr_purge_helpers = clamp(nr_purge_helpers, 1U, nr_purge_nodes) - 1;
> +
> +		for_each_cpu(i, &purge_nodes) {
> +			vn = &nodes[i];
> +
> +			if (nr_purge_helpers > 0) {
> +				INIT_WORK(&vn->purge_work, purge_vmap_node);
> +
> +				if (cpumask_test_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask))
> +					schedule_work_on(i, &vn->purge_work);
> +				else
> +					schedule_work(&vn->purge_work);
> +
> +				nr_purge_helpers--;
> +			} else {
> +				vn->purge_work.func = NULL;
> +				purge_vmap_node(&vn->purge_work);
> +				nr_purged_areas += vn->nr_purged;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
>  		for_each_cpu(i, &purge_nodes) {
>  			vn = &nodes[i];
> -			num_purged_areas += purge_vmap_node(vn);
> +
> +			if (vn->purge_work.func) {
> +				flush_work(&vn->purge_work);
> +				nr_purged_areas += vn->nr_purged;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	trace_purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end, num_purged_areas);
> -	return num_purged_areas > 0;
> +	trace_purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end, nr_purged_areas);
> +	return nr_purged_areas > 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1886,9 +2122,11 @@ static void drain_vmap_area_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   */
>  static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va)
>  {
> -	struct vmap_node *vn = addr_to_node(va->va_start);
>  	unsigned long nr_lazy_max = lazy_max_pages();
>  	unsigned long va_start = va->va_start;
> +	int vn_id = decode_vn_id(va->flags);
> +	struct vmap_node *vn = vn_id >= 0 ? id_to_node(vn_id):
> +		addr_to_node(va->va_start);;
>  	unsigned long nr_lazy;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&va->list)))
> @@ -4574,6 +4812,10 @@ static void vmap_init_nodes(void)
>  		vn->lazy.root = RB_ROOT;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vn->lazy.head);
>  		spin_lock_init(&vn->lazy.lock);
> +
> +		vn->free.root = RB_ROOT;
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vn->free.head);
> +		spin_lock_init(&vn->free.lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-06  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-29  8:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: vmalloc: Add va_alloc() helper Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  5:51   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 15:06     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: vmalloc: Rename adjust_va_to_fit_type() function Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  5:51   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:27     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: vmalloc: Move vmap_init_free_space() down in vmalloc.c Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  5:52   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:29     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 14:30   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30 14:48     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  2:17   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07  9:38     ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07  9:40       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  9:39     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  9:58       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08  1:51         ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08  4:43           ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08  5:01             ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08  6:44               ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 11:25                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-08 11:38                   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 13:23                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11  2:38   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 16:53     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:19       ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global purge_vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11  2:57   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:00     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06  6:04   ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-09-06 19:16     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07  0:06       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07  9:33         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11  3:25   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:10     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:21       ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vread_iter Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11  3:58   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 18:16     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:42       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:42         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-14  3:02           ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14  3:36           ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14  3:38             ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 10:59       ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:38         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:02   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:32     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29  8:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes/node_size based on CPU-cores Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:03   ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:31     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-31  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Baoquan He
2023-08-31 16:26   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 14:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 19:53   ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-05  6:53     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-06 20:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-09-07  9:15   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZPgWXgL1nLASjx8O@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox