From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:04:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPgWXgL1nLASjx8O@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230829081142.3619-7-urezki@gmail.com>
On 08/29/23 at 10:11am, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Concurrent access to a global vmap space is a bottle-neck.
> We can simulate a high contention by running a vmalloc test
> suite.
>
> To address it, introduce an effective vmap node logic. Each
> node behaves as independent entity. When a node is accessed
> it serves a request directly(if possible) also it can fetch
> a new block from a global heap to its internals if no space
> or low capacity is left.
>
> This technique reduces a pressure on the global vmap lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 279 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 5a8a9c1370b6..4fd4915c532d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -779,6 +779,7 @@ struct rb_list {
>
> struct vmap_node {
> /* Bookkeeping data of this node. */
> + struct rb_list free;
> struct rb_list busy;
> struct rb_list lazy;
>
> @@ -786,6 +787,13 @@ struct vmap_node {
> * Ready-to-free areas.
> */
> struct list_head purge_list;
> + struct work_struct purge_work;
> + unsigned long nr_purged;
> +
> + /*
> + * Control that only one user can pre-fetch this node.
> + */
> + atomic_t fill_in_progress;
> };
>
> static struct vmap_node *nodes, snode;
> @@ -804,6 +812,32 @@ addr_to_node(unsigned long addr)
> return &nodes[addr_to_node_id(addr)];
> }
>
> +static inline struct vmap_node *
> +id_to_node(int id)
> +{
> + return &nodes[id % nr_nodes];
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +this_node_id(void)
> +{
> + return raw_smp_processor_id() % nr_nodes;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long
> +encode_vn_id(int node_id)
> +{
> + /* Can store U8_MAX [0:254] nodes. */
> + return (node_id + 1) << BITS_PER_BYTE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +decode_vn_id(unsigned long val)
> +{
> + /* Can store U8_MAX [0:254] nodes. */
> + return (val >> BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1;
> +}
> +
> static __always_inline unsigned long
> va_size(struct vmap_area *va)
> {
> @@ -1586,6 +1620,7 @@ __alloc_vmap_area(struct rb_root *root, struct list_head *head,
> static void free_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
> {
> struct vmap_node *vn = addr_to_node(va->va_start);
> + int vn_id = decode_vn_id(va->flags);
>
> /*
> * Remove from the busy tree/list.
> @@ -1594,12 +1629,19 @@ static void free_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
> unlink_va(va, &vn->busy.root);
> spin_unlock(&vn->busy.lock);
>
> - /*
> - * Insert/Merge it back to the free tree/list.
> - */
> - spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> - merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> - spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + if (vn_id >= 0) {
In alloc_vmap_area(), the vn_id is encoded into va->flags. When
allocation failed, the vn_id = 0. Here should we change to check 'if
(vn_id > 0)' becasue the vn_id == 0 means no available vn_id encoded
into. And I do not get how we treat the case vn_id truly is 0.
va->flags = (addr != vend) ? encode_vn_id(vn_id) : 0;
> + vn = id_to_node(vn_id);
> +
> + /* Belongs to this node. */
> + spin_lock(&vn->free.lock);
> + merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &vn->free.root, &vn->free.head);
> + spin_unlock(&vn->free.lock);
> + } else {
> + /* Goes to global. */
> + spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> + spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + }
> }
>
> static inline void
......
> @@ -1640,7 +1810,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
> unsigned long freed;
> unsigned long addr;
> int purged = 0;
> - int ret;
> + int ret, vn_id;
>
> if (unlikely(!size || offset_in_page(size) || !is_power_of_2(align)))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -1661,11 +1831,17 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
> */
> kmemleak_scan_area(&va->rb_node, SIZE_MAX, gfp_mask);
>
> + vn_id = this_node_id();
> + addr = node_alloc(vn_id, size, align, vstart, vend, gfp_mask, node);
> + va->flags = (addr != vend) ? encode_vn_id(vn_id) : 0;
> +
> retry:
> - preload_this_cpu_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock, gfp_mask, node);
> - addr = __alloc_vmap_area(&free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list,
> - size, align, vstart, vend);
> - spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + if (addr == vend) {
> + preload_this_cpu_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock, gfp_mask, node);
> + addr = __alloc_vmap_area(&free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list,
> + size, align, vstart, vend);
> + spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + }
>
> trace_alloc_vmap_area(addr, size, align, vstart, vend, addr == vend);
>
> @@ -1679,7 +1855,7 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
> va->va_start = addr;
> va->va_end = addr + size;
> va->vm = NULL;
> - va->flags = va_flags;
> + va->flags |= va_flags;
>
> vn = addr_to_node(va->va_start);
>
> @@ -1772,31 +1948,58 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(vmap_purge_lock);
> static void purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus(void);
> static cpumask_t purge_nodes;
>
> -/*
> - * Purges all lazily-freed vmap areas.
> - */
> -static unsigned long
> -purge_vmap_node(struct vmap_node *vn)
> +static void
> +reclaim_list_global(struct list_head *head)
> +{
> + struct vmap_area *va, *n;
> +
> + if (list_empty(head))
> + return;
> +
> + spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(va, n, head, list)
> + merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va,
> + &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list);
> + spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void purge_vmap_node(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> - unsigned long num_purged_areas = 0;
> + struct vmap_node *vn = container_of(work,
> + struct vmap_node, purge_work);
> struct vmap_area *va, *n_va;
> + LIST_HEAD(global);
> +
> + vn->nr_purged = 0;
>
> if (list_empty(&vn->purge_list))
> - return 0;
> + return;
>
> - spin_lock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> + spin_lock(&vn->free.lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(va, n_va, &vn->purge_list, list) {
> unsigned long nr = (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long orig_start = va->va_start;
> unsigned long orig_end = va->va_end;
> + int vn_id = decode_vn_id(va->flags);
>
> - /*
> - * Finally insert or merge lazily-freed area. It is
> - * detached and there is no need to "unlink" it from
> - * anything.
> - */
> - va = merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &free_vmap_area_root,
> - &free_vmap_area_list);
> + list_del_init(&va->list);
> +
> + if (vn_id >= 0) {
> + if (va_size(va) != node_size - (2 * PAGE_SIZE))
> + va = merge_or_add_vmap_area_augment(va, &vn->free.root, &vn->free.head);
> +
> + if (va_size(va) == node_size - (2 * PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + if (!list_empty(&va->list))
> + unlink_va_augment(va, &vn->free.root);
> +
> + /* Restore the block size. */
> + va->va_start -= PAGE_SIZE;
> + va->va_end += PAGE_SIZE;
> + list_add(&va->list, &global);
> + }
> + } else {
> + list_add(&va->list, &global);
> + }
>
> if (!va)
> continue;
> @@ -1806,11 +2009,10 @@ purge_vmap_node(struct vmap_node *vn)
> va->va_start, va->va_end);
>
> atomic_long_sub(nr, &vmap_lazy_nr);
> - num_purged_areas++;
> + vn->nr_purged++;
> }
> - spin_unlock(&free_vmap_area_lock);
> -
> - return num_purged_areas;
> + spin_unlock(&vn->free.lock);
> + reclaim_list_global(&global);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1818,11 +2020,17 @@ purge_vmap_node(struct vmap_node *vn)
> */
> static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> - unsigned long num_purged_areas = 0;
> + unsigned long nr_purged_areas = 0;
> + unsigned int nr_purge_helpers;
> + unsigned int nr_purge_nodes;
> struct vmap_node *vn;
> int i;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&vmap_purge_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Use cpumask to mark which node has to be processed.
> + */
> purge_nodes = CPU_MASK_NONE;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
> @@ -1847,17 +2055,45 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> cpumask_set_cpu(i, &purge_nodes);
> }
>
> - if (cpumask_weight(&purge_nodes) > 0) {
> + nr_purge_nodes = cpumask_weight(&purge_nodes);
> + if (nr_purge_nodes > 0) {
> flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>
> + /* One extra worker is per a lazy_max_pages() full set minus one. */
> + nr_purge_helpers = atomic_long_read(&vmap_lazy_nr) / lazy_max_pages();
> + nr_purge_helpers = clamp(nr_purge_helpers, 1U, nr_purge_nodes) - 1;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(i, &purge_nodes) {
> + vn = &nodes[i];
> +
> + if (nr_purge_helpers > 0) {
> + INIT_WORK(&vn->purge_work, purge_vmap_node);
> +
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask))
> + schedule_work_on(i, &vn->purge_work);
> + else
> + schedule_work(&vn->purge_work);
> +
> + nr_purge_helpers--;
> + } else {
> + vn->purge_work.func = NULL;
> + purge_vmap_node(&vn->purge_work);
> + nr_purged_areas += vn->nr_purged;
> + }
> + }
> +
> for_each_cpu(i, &purge_nodes) {
> vn = &nodes[i];
> - num_purged_areas += purge_vmap_node(vn);
> +
> + if (vn->purge_work.func) {
> + flush_work(&vn->purge_work);
> + nr_purged_areas += vn->nr_purged;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> - trace_purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end, num_purged_areas);
> - return num_purged_areas > 0;
> + trace_purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end, nr_purged_areas);
> + return nr_purged_areas > 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1886,9 +2122,11 @@ static void drain_vmap_area_work(struct work_struct *work)
> */
> static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va)
> {
> - struct vmap_node *vn = addr_to_node(va->va_start);
> unsigned long nr_lazy_max = lazy_max_pages();
> unsigned long va_start = va->va_start;
> + int vn_id = decode_vn_id(va->flags);
> + struct vmap_node *vn = vn_id >= 0 ? id_to_node(vn_id):
> + addr_to_node(va->va_start);;
> unsigned long nr_lazy;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&va->list)))
> @@ -4574,6 +4812,10 @@ static void vmap_init_nodes(void)
> vn->lazy.root = RB_ROOT;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vn->lazy.head);
> spin_lock_init(&vn->lazy.lock);
> +
> + vn->free.root = RB_ROOT;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vn->free.head);
> + spin_lock_init(&vn->free.lock);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 8:11 [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: vmalloc: Add va_alloc() helper Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 15:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: vmalloc: Rename adjust_va_to_fit_type() function Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:27 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: vmalloc: Move vmap_init_free_space() down in vmalloc.c Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 5:52 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-06 16:29 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-08-29 14:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30 14:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 2:17 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:40 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 9:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 9:58 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 1:51 ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08 4:43 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 5:01 ` HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
2023-09-08 6:44 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 11:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-08 11:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-08 13:23 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11 2:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 16:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:19 ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: vmalloc: Remove global purge_vmap_area_root rb-tree Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11 2:57 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:00 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: vmalloc: Offload free_vmap_area_lock lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-06 6:04 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-09-06 19:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-07 0:06 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-07 9:33 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-11 3:25 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 17:10 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:21 ` Baoquan He
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vread_iter Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-11 3:58 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-11 18:16 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-12 13:42 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:42 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-14 3:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-14 3:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 10:59 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-13 15:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: vmalloc: Support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:02 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-29 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: vmalloc: Set nr_nodes/node_size based on CPU-cores Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-09-15 13:03 ` Baoquan He
2023-09-15 18:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-08-31 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Mitigate a vmap lock contention v2 Baoquan He
2023-08-31 16:26 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 14:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-04 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2023-09-05 6:53 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-09-06 20:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-09-07 9:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPgWXgL1nLASjx8O@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox