linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, shakeelb@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: oom: remove unnecessary goto in oom_evaluate_task()
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:46:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNxw0XXw2i+YHHJy@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814063428.4111206-2-zhangpeng362@huawei.com>

On Mon 14-08-23 14:34:27, Peng Zhang wrote:
> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> 
> Remove redundant goto statement in oom_evaluate_task() to simplify the
> code a bit. No functional modification involved.

Quite honestly, I do not see much point in changing the code this way.
We still have other goto labels and also there are other changes
happening where this label could be still benefitial [1]

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230810081319.65668-2-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com

> 
> Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 44bde56ecd02..10f7826c4035 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -335,14 +335,12 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg)
>  	 */
>  	if (oom_task_origin(task)) {
>  		points = LONG_MAX;
> -		goto select;
> +	} else {
> +		points = oom_badness(task, oc->totalpages);
> +		if (points == LONG_MIN || points < oc->chosen_points)
> +			goto next;
>  	}
>  
> -	points = oom_badness(task, oc->totalpages);
> -	if (points == LONG_MIN || points < oc->chosen_points)
> -		goto next;
> -
> -select:
>  	if (oc->chosen)
>  		put_task_struct(oc->chosen);
>  	get_task_struct(task);
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-16  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14  6:34 [PATCH 0/2] mm: oom: terminate the oom_evaluate_task() loop early Peng Zhang
2023-08-14  6:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: oom: remove unnecessary goto in oom_evaluate_task() Peng Zhang
2023-08-16  6:46   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-08-16  8:56     ` zhangpeng (AS)
2023-08-14  6:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: oom: terminate the oom_evaluate_task() loop early Peng Zhang
2023-08-16  6:48   ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-16  8:57     ` zhangpeng (AS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNxw0XXw2i+YHHJy@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox