From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1] mm: add a total mapcount for large folios
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:23:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNQD4pxo8svpGmvX@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809083256.699513-1-david@redhat.com>
Hi, David,
Some pure questions below..
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:32:56AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's track the total mapcount for all large folios in the first subpage.
>
> The total mapcount is what we actually want to know in folio_mapcount()
> and it is also sufficient for implementing folio_mapped(). This also
> gets rid of any "raceiness" concerns as expressed in
> folio_total_mapcount().
Any more information for that "raciness" described here?
>
> With sub-PMD THP becoming more important and things looking promising
> that we will soon get support for such anon THP, we want to avoid looping
> over all pages of a folio just to calculate the total mapcount. Further,
> we may soon want to use the total mapcount in other context more
> frequently, so prepare for reading it efficiently and atomically.
Any (perhaps existing) discussion on reduced loops vs added atomic
field/ops?
I had a feeling that there's some discussion behind the proposal of this
patch, if that's the case it'll be great to attach the link in the commit
log.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-09 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 8:32 David Hildenbrand
2023-08-09 15:45 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-09 19:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-09 19:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 10:40 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-10 11:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 11:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 11:35 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-09 19:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-09 19:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 3:14 ` Yin Fengwei
2023-08-09 21:23 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-08-10 3:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-10 8:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 21:48 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-10 21:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-10 21:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 15:03 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 15:14 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-11 15:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 8:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 10:48 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-10 17:15 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-10 17:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 19:02 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-08-10 20:57 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-10 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-10 22:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 15:18 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 15:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 15:58 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-11 16:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-11 16:11 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-11 22:18 ` Peter Xu
2023-08-10 22:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-10 3:24 ` Yin Fengwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNQD4pxo8svpGmvX@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox