linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	<apopple@nvidia.com>, <rppt@kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: skip zap maybe-dma-pinned pages for NUMA migration
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:58:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNMA1BMUOfUgYn/O@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNJSBS9w+6cS5eRM@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:32:37AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
.... 
> > This really needs to be fixed in the primary MMU and not require any direct
> > involvement from secondary MMUs, e.g. the mmu_notifier invalidation itself needs
> > to be skipped.
> 
> This likely has the same issue you just described, we don't know if it
> can be skipped until we iterate over the PTEs and by then it is too
> late to invoke the notifier. Maybe some kind of abort and restart
The problem is that KVM currently performs the zap in handler of .invalidate_range_start(),
so before abort in mm, KVM has done the zap in secondary MMU.

Or, could we move the zap in KVM side to handler of .invalidate_range_end() only for
MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA and MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_NUMA?

Then, in mm side, we could do the abort and update the range to contain only successful
subrange .invalidate_range_end().

Is that acceptable?

> scheme could work?
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-09  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-08  7:13 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Reduce NUMA balance caused TLB-shootdowns in a VM Yan Zhao
2023-08-08  7:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/mmu_notifier: introduce a new mmu notifier flag MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_NUMA Yan Zhao
2023-08-08  7:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: don't set PROT_NONE to maybe-dma-pinned pages for NUMA-migrate purpose Yan Zhao
2023-08-08  7:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: skip zap maybe-dma-pinned pages for NUMA migration Yan Zhao
2023-08-08 12:32   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 14:26     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-08 14:32       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-08 23:56         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-09  0:11           ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-09 11:59             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-08-10  9:08               ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-09  5:06           ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-09  2:58         ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2023-08-09  0:29       ` Yan Zhao
2023-08-26  6:39   ` liulongfang
2023-09-04  7:03     ` Yan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNMA1BMUOfUgYn/O@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox