From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
liubo <liubo254@huawei.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] smaps / mm/gup: fix gup_can_follow_protnone fallout
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:50:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMQcBWvjVUEBU6mF@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b647fd9a-3d75-625c-9f2c-dd3c251528c4@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:40:54PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Hmm. So three alternatives I see:
>
> 1) Use FOLL_FORCE in follow_page() to unconditionally disable protnone
> checks. Alternatively, have an internal FOLL_NO_PROTNONE flag if we
> don't like that.
>
> 2) Revert the commit and reintroduce unconditional FOLL_NUMA without
> FOLL_FORCE.
>
> 3) Have a FOLL_NUMA that callers like KVM can pass.
I'm afraid 3) means changing numa balancing to opt-in, probably no-go for
any non-kvm gup users as that could start to break there, even if making
smaps/follow_page happy again.
I keep worrying 1) on FOLL_FORCE abuse.
So I keep my vote on 2).
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 21:28 David Hildenbrand
2023-07-27 21:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] mm/gup: Make follow_page() succeed again on PROT_NONE PTEs/PMDs David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 2:30 ` John Hubbard
2023-07-28 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-27 21:28 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] smaps: use vm_normal_page_pmd() instead of follow_trans_huge_pmd() David Hildenbrand
2023-07-27 21:28 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] mm/gup: document FOLL_FORCE behavior David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 16:18 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] smaps / mm/gup: fix gup_can_follow_protnone fallout Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 17:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 17:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 19:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 19:50 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-07-28 20:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-02 10:24 ` Mel Gorman
2023-07-28 19:39 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-28 19:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 20:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-28 21:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 21:20 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-28 21:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-28 22:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-07-31 16:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-28 21:32 ` John Hubbard
2023-07-28 21:49 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-28 22:00 ` John Hubbard
2023-07-31 16:05 ` Peter Xu
[not found] ` <412bb30f-0417-802c-3fc4-a4e9d5891c5d@redhat.com>
2023-07-29 9:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-31 16:10 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-31 16:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-31 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 18:51 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-31 19:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-31 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-31 19:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01 13:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMQcBWvjVUEBU6mF@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liubo254@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox