From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] fs/proc/kcore: avoid bounce buffer for ktext data
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:48:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLqMtcPXAA8g/4JI@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHc2fm+9daF6cgCE@krava>
Hi Jiri,
On 05/31/23 at 01:58pm, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:15:16AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > Commit df04abfd181a ("fs/proc/kcore.c: Add bounce buffer for ktext data")
> > introduced the use of a bounce buffer to retrieve kernel text data for
> > /proc/kcore in order to avoid failures arising from hardened user copies
> > enabled by CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY in check_kernel_text_object().
> >
> > We can avoid doing this if instead of copy_to_user() we use _copy_to_user()
> > which bypasses the hardening check. This is more efficient than using a
> > bounce buffer and simplifies the code.
> >
> > We do so as part an overall effort to eliminate bounce buffer usage in the
> > function with an eye to converting it an iterator read.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> hi,
> sorry for late feedback, but looks like this one breaks reading
> /proc/kcore with objdump for me:
>
> # cat /proc/kallsyms | grep ksys_read
> ffffffff8150ebc0 T ksys_read
> # objdump -d --start-address=0xffffffff8150ebc0 --stop-address=0xffffffff8150ebd0 /proc/kcore
>
> /proc/kcore: file format elf64-x86-64
>
> objdump: Reading section load1 failed because: Bad address
>
> reverting this makes it work again
I met this too when I executed below command to trigger a kcore reading.
I wanted to do a simple testing during system running and got this.
makedumpfile --mem-usage /proc/kcore
Later I tried your above objdump testing, it corrupted system too.
Is there any conclusion about this issue you reported? I could miss
things in the discussion or patch posting to fix this.
Thanks
Baoquan
>
>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/kcore.c | 17 +++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > index 71157ee35c1a..556f310d6aa4 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> > @@ -541,19 +541,12 @@ read_kcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t buflen, loff_t *fpos)
> > case KCORE_VMEMMAP:
> > case KCORE_TEXT:
> > /*
> > - * Using bounce buffer to bypass the
> > - * hardened user copy kernel text checks.
> > + * We use _copy_to_user() to bypass usermode hardening
> > + * which would otherwise prevent this operation.
> > */
> > - if (copy_from_kernel_nofault(buf, (void *)start, tsz)) {
> > - if (clear_user(buffer, tsz)) {
> > - ret = -EFAULT;
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > - } else {
> > - if (copy_to_user(buffer, buf, tsz)) {
> > - ret = -EFAULT;
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > + if (_copy_to_user(buffer, (char *)start, tsz)) {
> > + ret = -EFAULT;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> > break;
> > default:
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 10:15 [PATCH v8 0/4] convert read_kcore(), vread() to use iterators Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] fs/proc/kcore: avoid bounce buffer for ktext data Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-31 11:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-07-21 13:48 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-07-21 14:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-07-24 6:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-24 8:08 ` Baoquan He
2023-07-24 8:18 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-07-24 14:33 ` Baoquan He
2023-07-31 19:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-07-31 19:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-31 19:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-07-31 20:34 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-07-31 21:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-07-31 21:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-07-31 21:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-07-24 9:38 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] fs/proc/kcore: convert read_kcore() to read_kcore_iter() Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] iov_iter: add copy_page_to_iter_nofault() Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-23 10:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] mm: vmalloc: convert vread() to vread_iter() Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-29 4:53 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] convert read_kcore(), vread() to use iterators Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLqMtcPXAA8g/4JI@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox