linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: collision between ZONE_MOVABLE and memblock allocations
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLkk5Z3jGT88is5g@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719224821.GC3528218@google.com>

On Wed 19-07-23 16:48:21, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 08:14:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 18-07-23 16:01:06, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I do think that we need to fix this collision between ZONE_MOVABLE and memmap
> > > allocations, because this issue essentially makes the movablecore= kernel
> > > command line parameter useless in many cases, as the ZONE_MOVABLE region it
> > > creates will often actually be unmovable.
> > 
> > movablecore is kinda hack and I would be more inclined to get rid of it
> > rather than build more into it. Could you be more specific about your
> > use case?
> 
> The problem that I'm trying to solve is that I'd like to be able to get kernel
> core dumps off machines (chromebooks) so that we can debug crashes.  Because
> the memory used by the crash kernel ("crashkernel=" kernel command line
> option) is consumed the entire time the machine is booted, there is a strong
> motivation to keep the crash kernel as small and as simple as possible.  To
> this end I'm trying to get away without SSD drivers, not having to worry about
> encryption on the SSDs, etc.
> 
> So, the rough plan right now is:
> 
> 1) During boot set aside some memory that won't contain kernel allocations.
> I'm trying to do this now with ZONE_MOVABLE, but I'm open to better ways.
> 
> We set aside memory for a crash kernel & arm it so that the ZONE_MOVABLE
> region (or whatever non-kernel region) will be set aside as PMEM in the crash
> kernel.  This is done with the memmap=nn[KMG]!ss[KMG] kernel command line
> parameter passed to the crash kernel.
> 
> So, in my sample 4G VM system, I see:
> 
>   # lsmem --split ZONES --output-all
>   RANGE                                  SIZE  STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK NODE   ZONES
>   0x0000000000000000-0x0000000007ffffff  128M online       yes     0    0    None
>   0x0000000008000000-0x00000000bfffffff  2.9G online       yes  1-23    0   DMA32
>   0x0000000100000000-0x000000012fffffff  768M online       yes 32-37    0  Normal
>   0x0000000130000000-0x000000013fffffff  256M online       yes 38-39    0 Movable
>   
>   Memory block size:       128M
>   Total online memory:       4G
>   Total offline memory:      0B
> 
> so I'll pass "memmap=256M!0x130000000" to the crash kernel.
> 
> 2) When we hit a kernel crash, we know (hope?) that the PMEM region we've set
> aside only contains user data, which we don't want to store anyway.  We make a
> filesystem in there, and create a kernel crash dump using 'makedumpfile':
> 
>   mkfs.ext4 /dev/pmem0
>   mount /dev/pmem0 /mnt
>   makedumpfile -c -d 31 /proc/vmcore /mnt/kdump
> 
> We then set up the next full kernel boot to also have this same PMEM region,
> using the same memmap kernel parameter.  We reboot back into a full kernel.

Btw. How do you ensure that the address range doesn't get reinitialized
by POST? Do you rely on kexec boot here?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-20 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 22:01 Ross Zwisler
2023-07-19  5:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-19 22:26   ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-21 11:20     ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-26  7:49       ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-26 10:48         ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-26 12:57           ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-26 13:23             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-26 14:23               ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-19  6:14 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-19  7:59   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-19  8:06     ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-19  8:14       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-19 23:05         ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-26  8:31           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-19 22:48   ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-20  7:49     ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-20 12:13     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-07-24 16:56       ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-26  8:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 13:08       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-27  8:18       ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-27  9:41         ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZLkk5Z3jGT88is5g@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zwisler@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox