From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: collision between ZONE_MOVABLE and memblock allocations
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLkk5Z3jGT88is5g@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719224821.GC3528218@google.com>
On Wed 19-07-23 16:48:21, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 08:14:48AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 18-07-23 16:01:06, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I do think that we need to fix this collision between ZONE_MOVABLE and memmap
> > > allocations, because this issue essentially makes the movablecore= kernel
> > > command line parameter useless in many cases, as the ZONE_MOVABLE region it
> > > creates will often actually be unmovable.
> >
> > movablecore is kinda hack and I would be more inclined to get rid of it
> > rather than build more into it. Could you be more specific about your
> > use case?
>
> The problem that I'm trying to solve is that I'd like to be able to get kernel
> core dumps off machines (chromebooks) so that we can debug crashes. Because
> the memory used by the crash kernel ("crashkernel=" kernel command line
> option) is consumed the entire time the machine is booted, there is a strong
> motivation to keep the crash kernel as small and as simple as possible. To
> this end I'm trying to get away without SSD drivers, not having to worry about
> encryption on the SSDs, etc.
>
> So, the rough plan right now is:
>
> 1) During boot set aside some memory that won't contain kernel allocations.
> I'm trying to do this now with ZONE_MOVABLE, but I'm open to better ways.
>
> We set aside memory for a crash kernel & arm it so that the ZONE_MOVABLE
> region (or whatever non-kernel region) will be set aside as PMEM in the crash
> kernel. This is done with the memmap=nn[KMG]!ss[KMG] kernel command line
> parameter passed to the crash kernel.
>
> So, in my sample 4G VM system, I see:
>
> # lsmem --split ZONES --output-all
> RANGE SIZE STATE REMOVABLE BLOCK NODE ZONES
> 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000007ffffff 128M online yes 0 0 None
> 0x0000000008000000-0x00000000bfffffff 2.9G online yes 1-23 0 DMA32
> 0x0000000100000000-0x000000012fffffff 768M online yes 32-37 0 Normal
> 0x0000000130000000-0x000000013fffffff 256M online yes 38-39 0 Movable
>
> Memory block size: 128M
> Total online memory: 4G
> Total offline memory: 0B
>
> so I'll pass "memmap=256M!0x130000000" to the crash kernel.
>
> 2) When we hit a kernel crash, we know (hope?) that the PMEM region we've set
> aside only contains user data, which we don't want to store anyway. We make a
> filesystem in there, and create a kernel crash dump using 'makedumpfile':
>
> mkfs.ext4 /dev/pmem0
> mount /dev/pmem0 /mnt
> makedumpfile -c -d 31 /proc/vmcore /mnt/kdump
>
> We then set up the next full kernel boot to also have this same PMEM region,
> using the same memmap kernel parameter. We reboot back into a full kernel.
Btw. How do you ensure that the address range doesn't get reinitialized
by POST? Do you rely on kexec boot here?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-18 22:01 Ross Zwisler
2023-07-19 5:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-19 22:26 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-21 11:20 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-26 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-26 10:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-26 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-26 13:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-26 14:23 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-19 6:14 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-19 7:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-19 8:06 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-19 8:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-19 23:05 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-26 8:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-19 22:48 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-20 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-20 12:13 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-07-24 16:56 ` Ross Zwisler
2023-07-26 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-26 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-27 8:18 ` Michal Hocko
2023-07-27 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLkk5Z3jGT88is5g@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zwisler@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox