From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com,
josef@toxicpanda.com, jack@suse.cz, ldufour@linux.ibm.com,
laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com, michel@lespinasse.org,
liam.howlett@oracle.com, jglisse@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
minchan@google.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, lstoakes@gmail.com,
hdanton@sina.com, apopple@nvidia.com, peterx@redhat.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, david@redhat.com, yuzhao@google.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] mm: change folio_lock_or_retry to use vm_fault directly
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 04:47:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJ5QR5q2WtD2z1rd@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpH7uBPS4v24MEh_4XTfJ1bz3oUhHGvtNY=XwoicXc8_XA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:45:39PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 8:36 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 07:04:33PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > Change folio_lock_or_retry to accept vm_fault struct and return the
> > > vm_fault_t directly.
> >
> > I thought we decided to call this folio_lock_fault()?
> >
> > > +static inline vm_fault_t folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio,
> > > + struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > > {
> > > might_sleep();
> > > - return folio_trylock(folio) || __folio_lock_or_retry(folio, mm, flags);
> > > + return folio_trylock(folio) ? 0 : __folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vmf);
> >
> > No, don't use the awful ternary operator. The || form is used
> > everywhere else.
>
> Ok, but folio_trylock() returns a boolean while folio_lock_or_retry
> should return vm_fault_t. How exactly do you suggest changing this?
> Something like this perhaps:
>
> static inline vm_fault_t folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio,
> struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> might_sleep();
> if (folio_trylock(folio))
> return 0;
> return __folio_lock_or_retry(folio, mm, flags);
> }
>
> ?
I think the automatic casting would work, but I prefer what you've
written here.
> > > /*
> > > * Return values:
> > > - * true - folio is locked; mmap_lock is still held.
> > > - * false - folio is not locked.
> > > + * 0 - folio is locked.
> > > + * VM_FAULT_RETRY - folio is not locked.
> >
> > I don't think we want to be so prescriptive here. It returns non-zero
> > if the folio is not locked. The precise value is not something that
> > callers should depend on.
>
> Ok, I'll change it to "non-zero" here.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-30 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 2:04 [PATCH v6 0/6] Per-VMA lock support for swap and userfaults Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] swap: remove remnants of polling from read_swap_cache_async Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] mm: add missing VM_FAULT_RESULT_TRACE name for VM_FAULT_COMPLETED Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mm: drop per-VMA lock when returning VM_FAULT_RETRY or VM_FAULT_COMPLETED Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] mm: change folio_lock_or_retry to use vm_fault directly Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 3:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-06-30 3:45 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 3:47 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-06-30 21:25 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] mm: handle swap page faults under per-VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-06-30 2:04 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] mm: handle userfaults under VMA lock Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZJ5QR5q2WtD2z1rd@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
--cc=minchan@google.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox