linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/17] mm/slab: Decouple ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:13:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIhPaixb/0ve7zZo@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5faed13c-43f2-66ef-c42c-7d7bebb224d8@suse.cz>

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 6/12/23 17:31, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > In preparation for supporting a kmalloc() minimum alignment smaller than
> > the arch DMA alignment, decouple the two definitions. This requires that
> > either the kmalloc() caches are aligned to a (run-time) cache-line size
> > or the DMA API bounces unaligned kmalloc() allocations. Subsequent
> > patches will implement both options.
> > 
> > After this patch, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is expected to be used in static
> > alignment annotations and defined by an architecture to be the maximum
> > alignment for all supported configurations/SoCs in a single Image.
> > Architectures opting in to a smaller ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN will need to
> > define its value in the arch headers.
> > 
> > Since ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is now always defined, adjust the #ifdef in
> > dma_get_cache_alignment() so that there is no change for architectures
> > not requiring a minimum DMA alignment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > Tested-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Thanks for the ack.

It looks like moving the ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN definition to linux/cache.h
messes up powerpc32 -
https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306131053.1ybvRRhO-lkp@intel.com - possibly
a few other architecture that define this macro in a file other than
asm/cache.h (I only tested powerpc64 before posting).

At a quick grep, we have:

  arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h:34: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

This could be moved to asm/cache.h. It probably already relies on some
indirect includes.

  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic/kmalloc.h:10: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       128
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/kmalloc.h:7: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       32
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip32/kmalloc.h:9: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       128
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-n64/kmalloc.h:6: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-tx49xx/kmalloc.h:5: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES

These are ok since kmalloc.h is included in asm/cache.h.

  arch/powerpc/include/asm/page_32.h:16: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

I'd move this macro to asm/cache.h on powerpc. asm/page_32.h already
includes asm/cache.h.

  arch/sh/include/asm/page.h:181: #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN       L1_CACHE_BYTES

Same here. L1_CACHE_BYTES is defined in asm/cache.h but it's not
included in asm/page.h, so I guess it's relying on some indirect
includes.

I'll post three more patches to move the ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to
asm/cache.h for microblaze, powerpc and sh (once I finished build
testing).

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-13 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-12 15:31 [PATCH v7 00/17] mm, dma, arm64: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] mm/slab: Decouple ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN Catalin Marinas
2023-06-13  9:46   ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-06-13 11:13     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/17] dma: Allow dma_get_cache_alignment() to be overridden by the arch code Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] mm/slab: Simplify create_kmalloc_cache() args and make it static Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] mm/slab: Limit kmalloc() minimum alignment to dma_get_cache_alignment() Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] drivers/base: Use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] drivers/gpu: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] drivers/usb: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] drivers/spi: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] dm-crypt: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] iio: core: " Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] arm64: Allow kmalloc() caches aligned to the smaller cache_line_size() Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] scatterlist: Add dedicated config for DMA flags Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] dma-mapping: Name SG DMA flag helpers consistently Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] dma-mapping: Force bouncing if the kmalloc() size is not cache-line-aligned Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] iommu/dma: Force bouncing if the size is not cacheline-aligned Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] mm: slab: Reduce the kmalloc() minimum alignment if DMA bouncing possible Catalin Marinas
2023-06-12 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] arm64: Enable ARCH_WANT_KMALLOC_DMA_BOUNCE for arm64 Catalin Marinas
2023-07-05 13:40 ` [PATCH v7 00/17] mm, dma, arm64: Reduce ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to 8 Amit Pundir
2023-07-07  0:41   ` Isaac Manjarres
2023-07-08 13:02     ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-11 19:44       ` Isaac Manjarres
2023-07-12  4:57         ` Amit Pundir
2023-07-09  3:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-28 16:41 ` John Ernberg
2025-03-28 19:38   ` Frank Li
2025-03-31  8:02     ` John Ernberg
2025-03-31 16:21       ` Frank Li
2025-04-01 12:56         ` John Ernberg
2025-04-01 16:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-02 10:35     ` John Ernberg
2025-05-02 12:02     ` John Ernberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIhPaixb/0ve7zZo@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox