From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
mkoutny@suse.com, ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: Flush stats before releasing blkcg_gq
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 10:37:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG14VnHl20lt9jLc@ovpn-8-17.pek2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJD7tkZkbro4H-QC=RJx_dfCdGQ5c=4NJhbFrcEmQSidaaMOmg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Yosry,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:06:38PM -0700, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 6:21 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > As noted by Michal, the blkg_iostat_set's in the lockless list
> > hold reference to blkg's to protect against their removal. Those
> > blkg's hold reference to blkcg. When a cgroup is being destroyed,
> > cgroup_rstat_flush() is only called at css_release_work_fn() which
> > is called when the blkcg reference count reaches 0. This circular
> > dependency will prevent blkcg and some blkgs from being freed after
> > they are made offline.
>
> I am not at all familiar with blkcg, but does calling
> cgroup_rstat_flush() in offline_css() fix the problem?
Except for offline, this list needs to be flushed after the associated disk
is deleted.
> or can items be
> added to the lockless list(s) after the blkcg is offlined?
Yeah.
percpu_ref_*get(&blkg->refcnt) still can succeed after the percpu refcnt
is killed in blkg_destroy() which is called from both offline css and
removing disk.
>
> >
> > It is less a problem if the cgroup to be destroyed also has other
> > controllers like memory that will call cgroup_rstat_flush() which will
> > clean up the reference count. If block is the only controller that uses
> > rstat, these offline blkcg and blkgs may never be freed leaking more
> > and more memory over time.
> >
> > To prevent this potential memory leak:
> >
> > - a new cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush() function is added to flush stats for
> > a given css and cpu. This new function will be called in __blkg_release().
> >
> > - don't grab bio->bi_blkg when adding the stats into blkcg's per-cpu
> > stat list, and this kind of handling is the most fragile part of
> > original patch
> >
> > Based on Waiman's patch:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221215033132.230023-3-longman@redhat.com/
> >
> > Fixes: 3b8cc6298724 ("blk-cgroup: Optimize blkcg_rstat_flush()")
> > Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> > Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Cc: mkoutny@suse.com
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/blk-cgroup.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > include/linux/cgroup.h | 1 +
> > kernel/cgroup/rstat.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> > index 0ce64dd73cfe..5437b6af3955 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
> > @@ -163,10 +163,23 @@ static void blkg_free(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
> > static void __blkg_release(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > {
> > struct blkcg_gq *blkg = container_of(rcu, struct blkcg_gq, rcu_head);
> > + struct blkcg *blkcg = blkg->blkcg;
> > + int cpu;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_PUNT_BIO
> > WARN_ON(!bio_list_empty(&blkg->async_bios));
> > #endif
> > + /*
> > + * Flush all the non-empty percpu lockless lists before releasing
> > + * us. Meantime no new bio can refer to this blkg any more given
> > + * the refcnt is killed.
> > + */
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + struct llist_head *lhead = per_cpu_ptr(blkcg->lhead, cpu);
> > +
> > + if (!llist_empty(lhead))
> > + cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush(&blkcg->css, cpu);
> > + }
> >
> > /* release the blkcg and parent blkg refs this blkg has been holding */
> > css_put(&blkg->blkcg->css);
> > @@ -991,7 +1004,6 @@ static void blkcg_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
> > if (parent && parent->parent)
> > blkcg_iostat_update(parent, &blkg->iostat.cur,
> > &blkg->iostat.last);
> > - percpu_ref_put(&blkg->refcnt);
> > }
> >
> > out:
> > @@ -2075,7 +2087,6 @@ void blk_cgroup_bio_start(struct bio *bio)
> >
> > llist_add(&bis->lnode, lhead);
> > WRITE_ONCE(bis->lqueued, true);
> > - percpu_ref_get(&bis->blkg->refcnt);
> > }
> >
> > u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&bis->sync, flags);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > index 885f5395fcd0..97d4764d8e6a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ void cgroup_rstat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> > void cgroup_rstat_flush_atomic(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> > void cgroup_rstat_flush_hold(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> > void cgroup_rstat_flush_release(void);
> > +void cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu);
> >
> > /*
> > * Basic resource stats.
> > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> > index 9c4c55228567..96e7a4e6da72 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
> > @@ -281,6 +281,24 @@ void cgroup_rstat_flush_release(void)
> > spin_unlock_irq(&cgroup_rstat_lock);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush - flush stats for the given css and cpu
> > + * @css: target css to be flush
> > + * @cpu: the cpu that holds the stats to be flush
> > + *
> > + * A lightweight rstat flush operation for a given css and cpu.
> > + * Only the cpu_lock is being held for mutual exclusion, the cgroup_rstat_lock
> > + * isn't used.
>
> (Adding linux-mm and memcg maintainers)
> +Linux-MM +Michal Hocko +Shakeel Butt +Johannes Weiner +Roman Gushchin
> +Muchun Song
>
> I don't think flushing the stats without holding cgroup_rstat_lock is
> safe for memcg stats flushing. mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush() modifies
> some non-percpu data (e.g. memcg->vmstats->state,
> memcg->vmstats->state_pending).
>
> Perhaps have this be a separate callback than css_rstat_flush() (e.g.
> css_rstat_flush_cpu() or something), so that it's clear what
> subsystems support this? In this case, only blkcg would implement this
> callback.
Also I guess cgroup_rstat_flush() can be used here too.
BTW, cgroup_rstat_flush() is annotated as might_sleep(), however it won't
sleep actually, so can this might_sleep() be removed?
>
> > + */
> > +void cgroup_rstat_css_cpu_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + raw_spinlock_t *cpu_lock = per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock, cpu);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irq(cpu_lock);
> > + css->ss->css_rstat_flush(css, cpu);
>
> I think we need to check that css_rstat_flush() (or a new callback) is
> implemented before calling it here.
Good catch!
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-24 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230524011935.719659-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
2023-05-24 2:06 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-24 2:37 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-05-24 2:43 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-05-24 4:10 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-24 4:21 ` Ming Lei
2023-05-25 14:11 ` Michal Koutný
2023-05-25 15:25 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-26 21:11 ` Michal Koutný
2023-05-24 4:04 ` Waiman Long
2023-05-24 4:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZG14VnHl20lt9jLc@ovpn-8-17.pek2.redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox