From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap/vma_merge: always check invariants
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 17:17:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFvDrZRV8RnoPR69@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZFvAnF0DzEUN7F9r@murray>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:04:44AM -0700, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:15:51PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 09:19:17PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > We may still have inconsistent input parameters even if we choose not to
> > > merge and the vma_merge() invariant checks are useful for checking this
> > > with no production runtime cost (these are only relevant when
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is specified).
> > >
> > > Therefore, perform these checks regardless of whether we merge.
> > >
> > > This is relevant, as a recent issue (addressed in commit "mm/mempolicy:
> > > Correctly update prev when policy is equal on mbind") in the mbind logic
> > > was only picked up in the 6.2.y stable branch where these assertions are
> > > performed prior to determining mergeability.
> > >
> > > Had this remained the same in mainline this issue may have been picked up
> > > faster, so moving forward let's always check them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > mm/mmap.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > > index 5522130ae606..13678edaa22c 100644
> > > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > > @@ -960,17 +960,17 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > merge_next = true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* Verify some invariant that must be enforced by the caller. */
> > > + VM_WARN_ON(prev && addr <= prev->vm_start);
> > > + VM_WARN_ON(curr && (addr != curr->vm_start || end > curr->vm_end));
> > > + VM_WARN_ON(addr >= end);
> > > +
> >
> > I'm seeing this fire a lot when fuzzing v6.4-rc1 on arm64 using Syzkaller.
> >
>
> Thanks, from the line I suspect addr != curr->vm_start, but need to look
> into the repro, at lsf/mm so a bit time lagged :)
No problem; FWIW I can confirm your theory, the reproducer is causing:
addr > curr->vm_start
... confirmed the the following hack, log below.
| diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
| index 13678edaa22c..2cdebba15719 100644
| --- a/mm/mmap.c
| +++ b/mm/mmap.c
| @@ -961,9 +961,21 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
| }
|
| /* Verify some invariant that must be enforced by the caller. */
| - VM_WARN_ON(prev && addr <= prev->vm_start);
| - VM_WARN_ON(curr && (addr != curr->vm_start || end > curr->vm_end));
| - VM_WARN_ON(addr >= end);
| + VM_WARN(prev && addr <= prev->vm_start,
| + "addr = 0x%016lx, prev->vm_start = 0x%016lx\n",
| + addr, prev->vm_start);
| +
| + VM_WARN(curr && addr != curr->vm_start,
| + "addr = 0x%016lx, curr->vm_start = 0x%016lx\n",
| + addr, curr->vm_start);
| +
| + VM_WARN(curr && addr > curr->vm_end,
| + "addr = 0x%016lx, curr->vm_end = 0x%016lx\n",
| + addr, curr->vm_end);
| +
| + VM_WARN(addr >= end,
| + "addr = 0x%016lx, end = 0x%016lx\n",
| + addr, end);
|
| if (!merge_prev && !merge_next)
| return NULL; /* Not mergeable. */
... with that applied, running the reproducer results in:
| addr = 0x0000ffff99dc2000, curr->vm_start = 0x0000ffff99db2000
| WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 163 at mm/mmap.c:968 vma_merge+0x3d4/0x1260
... i.e. addr > curr->vm_start
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-10 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-30 20:19 Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-02 9:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-02 11:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-05-02 13:13 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-02 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2023-05-10 14:15 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-10 16:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-10 16:17 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-05-10 16:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-11 18:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-05-12 1:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-05-14 17:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZFvDrZRV8RnoPR69@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox